跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
站内改写2 分钟阅读

待翻译:Putting Captions to the Test: Evaluating Video Caption Quality through Multiple-Choice Question Answering

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:Evaluating video captioning remains a critical challenge for Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). Existing metrics primarily rely on matching generated text against ground-truth references. This paradigm suffers from the “one-to-many” nature of video description, where high-quality captions are often penalized for lexical mismatches or valid shifts in visual focus. Furthermore, such assessments are typically one-dimensional, failing to provide a fine-grained analysis of caption quality. To address this, we redefine caption quality via information fidelity: A caption must maximize the coverage…

待翻译:Putting Captions to the Test: Evaluating Video Caption Quality through Multiple-Choice Question Answering
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

content type paperpublished September 2026 Putting Captions to the Test: Evaluating Video Caption Quality through Multiple-Choice Question Answering AuthorsZizhen Wang, Bo Feng, Zhengfeng Lai†, Shiyu Li, Yang Lu, Meng Cao, Ping Huang, Simon Wang View publication Evaluating video captioning remains a critical challenge for Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). Existing metrics primarily rely on matching generated text against ground-truth references. This paradigm suffers from the “one-to-many” nature of video description, where high-quality captions are often penalized for lexical mismatches or valid shifts in visual focus. Furthermore, such assessments are typically one-dimensional, failing to provide a fine-grained analysis of caption quality. To address this, we redefine caption quality via information fidelity: A caption must maximize the coverage of salient visual information while ensuring strict factuality. We introduce CapQuiz, a novel reference-free benchmark that assesses captions based on their utility in answering human-verified, fine-grained, multiple-choice questions derived from the video. CapQuiz features a hierarchical taxonomy of 10 question types (spanning Descriptive and Inferential categories) across 24 diverse video domains. We further formulate CapF1, a composite metric that synthesizes CapP (measuring factuality) and CapR (measuring coverage). Extensive experiments demonstrate that CapQuiz correlates significantly better with human judgments than existing metrics and offers interpretable insights into model performance. † MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models Work done while at Apple BalCapRL: A Balanced Framework for RL-Based MLLM Image Captioning May 11, 2026research area Computer Vision, research area Methods and Algorithms Image captioning is one of the most fundamental tasks in computer vision. Owing to its open-ended nature, it has received significant attention in the era of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). In pursuit of ever more detailed and accurate captions, recent work has increasingly turned to reinforcement learning (RL). However, existing captioning-RL methods and evaluation metrics often emphasize a narrow notion of caption quality, inducing… Read more Revisit Large-Scale Image–Caption Data in Pre-training Multimodal Foundation Models April 8, 2025research area Computer Vision, research area Methods and Algorithmsconference ICLR Recent advancements in multimodal models highlight the value of rewritten captions for improving performance, yet key challenges remain. Notably, the role of synthetic captions and their interaction with original web-crawled AltTexts in pre-training is still unclear. Additionally, different multimodal foundation models may have distinct preferences for specific caption formats while the efforts of studying the optimal captions for each foundation… Read more

展开要点与分析

文章情报

投资人进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • Evaluating video captioning remains a critical challenge for Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). Existing metrics primarily rely on matching generated text against ground-truth…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。