待翻译：Potential-Guided Particle Steering for Negation-Constrained Dexterous Grasping
AI 服务暂时不可用，以下为来源摘要，待恢复后补全翻译：arXiv:2609.00555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language-driven dexterous grasp models, such as DextER, perform well when instructions specify where to grasp, but we find they fail systematically when an instruction also specifies where not to grasp (e.g., "grasp the handle but avoid the body"). Existing training corpora, DexGYSNet among them, contain virtually no avoidance instructions, and collecting examples for every possible constraint is impractical. Moreover, because every part mentioned during training denotes a contact target, models may interpret a forbidden part as another region to grasp rather than one to avoid. We therefore introduce an inference-time framework for negation-constrained dexterous grasping that requires no negation-specific training examples. Combining Sequential Monte Carlo with classifier-free guidance, our method guides sampling toward the instructed part while pruning candidates headed for the forbidden region, without any negation examples during training. A frozen 3D part-grounding model localizes the forbidden region from the language instruction. To evaluate this setting, we construct NegGrasp, a benchmark of paired positive/negative instructions with constraint-aware metrics that credit a grasp only if it both accomplishes the task and respects the stated constraint. On NegGrasp, our method reduces the violation rate of the strongest baseline from 57.9% to 17.2% while improving both constraint-aware and physical success.
AI 服务暂时不可用，以下为来源正文，待恢复后补全翻译。
--> [Submitted on 1 Sep 2026] Title:Potential-Guided Particle Steering for Negation-Constrained Dexterous Grasping View a PDF of the paper titled Potential-Guided Particle Steering for Negation-Constrained Dexterous Grasping, by Geonho Kim and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Language-driven dexterous grasp models, such as DextER, perform well when instructions specify where to grasp, but we find they fail systematically when an instruction also specifies where not to grasp (e.g., "grasp the handle but avoid the body"). Existing training corpora, DexGYSNet among them, contain virtually no avoidance instructions, and collecting examples for every possible constraint is impractical. Moreover, because every part mentioned during training denotes a contact target, models may interpret a forbidden part as another region to grasp rather than one to avoid. We therefore introduce an inference-time framework for negation-constrained dexterous grasping that requires no negation-specific training examples. Combining Sequential Monte Carlo with classifier-free guidance, our method guides sampling toward the instructed part while pruning candidates headed for the forbidden region, without any negation examples during training. A frozen 3D part-grounding model localizes the forbidden region from the language instruction. To evaluate this setting, we construct NegGrasp, a benchmark of paired positive/negative instructions with constraint-aware metrics that credit a grasp only if it both accomplishes the task and respects the stated constraint. On NegGrasp, our method reduces the violation rate of the strongest baseline from 57.9% to 17.2% while improving both constraint-aware and physical success. Comments: Project page: this https URL Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.00555 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2609.00555v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00555 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Geonho Kim [view email] [v1] Tue, 1 Sep 2026 01:46:30 UTC (2,935 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Potential-Guided Particle Steering for Negation-Constrained Dexterous Grasping, by Geonho Kim and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.RO new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CV References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)