跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.13152v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) perform strongly on static science benchmarks, yet their ability to reason about the physical world through active experimentation remains poorly understood. We introduce PhysMent, a benchmark that evaluates LLM physical reasoning via iterative, toolmediated interaction with a MuJoCo physics simulator. Unlike static benchmarks that supply all quantities upfront, PhysMent requires models to discover information by applying forces, querying object states, advancing time, and modifying scene geometry before answering. The benchmark comprises 105 scenes of classical mechanics, organized across four difficulty regimes (Easy/Hard and Single/Multi), three scene modalities (standard, object cr…

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Joseph Chan, Utkarsh Jha, Xiyin Yang, Abhinav Jarajapu, Anik Sahai, Eddie Hu, Robin Jeshua Deepak, Stefano Saravalle, Aditya Shah
待翻譯:PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 7 Jul 2026] Title:PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems View a PDF of the paper titled PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems, by Joseph Chan and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) perform strongly on static science benchmarks, yet their ability to reason about the physical world through active experimentation remains poorly understood. We introduce PhysMent, a benchmark that evaluates LLM physical reasoning via iterative, toolmediated interaction with a MuJoCo physics simulator. Unlike static benchmarks that supply all quantities upfront, PhysMent requires models to discover information by applying forces, querying object states, advancing time, and modifying scene geometry before answering. The benchmark comprises 105 scenes of classical mechanics, organized across four difficulty regimes (Easy/Hard and Single/Multi), three scene modalities (standard, object creation, hidden objects), and a scene-manipulation category, evaluated with a six-dimensional scoring framework. Results show that current models perform reasonably well on qualitative single-concept tasks (up to 80% accuracy) but degrade substantially on quantitative tasks that demand precise, multi-step experimental procedures: most models fall below 30% on the hardest single-concept category, where the bottleneck is procedural (adaptive multi-step tool use) rather than conceptual load. Across the seven models, accuracy ranges from 25% to 67%, with failures due to premature answer submission, inefficient exploration, and inconsistent grounding in simulator feedback rather than conceptual gaps. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.13152 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.13152v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13152 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Stefano Saravalle [view email] [v1] Tue, 7 Jul 2026 10:48:11 UTC (979 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems, by Joseph Chan and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CV References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2609.13152v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) perform strongly on static science benchmarks, yet their ability to reason about the physical world th…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。