跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
站内改写2 分钟阅读

待翻译:PAC-Private Autoregressive Generation: Calibrating Noise to Ensemble Disagreement

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2609.05676v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models adapted on private text are often served through APIs, so privacy leakage occurs through generated outputs rather than exposed weights. Private prediction protects these releases. Methods such as PMixED incur privacy cost at each release and increasingly rely on the public model over long horizons. PAC privacy instead calibrates noise to output variability across possible secrets, adding less noise when predictions are stable. To our knowledge, PAC-private prediction has not previously been extended from classification to autoregressive generation. We construct $m=128$ overlapping worlds from the private corpus, with each record appearing in exactly $m/2$ worlds, and train one adapter per world ove…

来源arXiv Machine Learning作者: Mina Mirzadehsarcheshmeh, Amir Keyvan Khandani
待翻译:PAC-Private Autoregressive Generation: Calibrating Noise to Ensemble Disagreement
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 4 Sep 2026] Title:PAC-Private Autoregressive Generation: Calibrating Noise to Ensemble Disagreement View a PDF of the paper titled PAC-Private Autoregressive Generation: Calibrating Noise to Ensemble Disagreement, by Mina Mirzadehsarcheshmeh and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Language models adapted on private text are often served through APIs, so privacy leakage occurs through generated outputs rather than exposed weights. Private prediction protects these releases. Methods such as PMixED incur privacy cost at each release and increasingly rely on the public model over long horizons. PAC privacy instead calibrates noise to output variability across possible secrets, adding less noise when predictions are stable. To our knowledge, PAC-private prediction has not previously been extended from classification to autoregressive generation. We construct $m=128$ overlapping worlds from the private corpus, with each record appearing in exactly $m/2$ worlds, and train one adapter per world over a frozen public model. The realized world is the secret. At each token, the public model defines a candidate set, the worlds vote, and their posterior-weighted disagreement determines the PAC noise; unanimity requires no calibration noise. We prove $I(S;Y_{1:T}) \leq I(S;H_T) \leq bT$. Our contributions are extending PAC privacy to autoregressive generation, handling adaptive self-generated contexts, and introducing coupled decoding that preserves privacy accounting while avoiding greedy degeneration. On WikiText-103 with GPT-2-small, we retain 74% of the fine-tuning gain at a per-token budget of $2^{-32}$, while membership-inference success is bounded by 51.08% after $10^6$ tokens; posterior-entropy estimates of leakage are roughly 17% of the charged budget. Inference privacy is not content protection: even when membership advantage on a memorized canary is indistinguishable from zero, the canary is emitted at the same rate. Against PMixED under matched membership-inference bounds on the same data universe and test set, we retain 98% of non-private headroom from $10^2$ to $10^6$ tokens, versus at most 56%, with no crossover. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.05676 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2609.05676v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05676 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Mina Mirzadeh [view email] [v1] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 19:16:39 UTC (210 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled PAC-Private Autoregressive Generation: Calibrating Noise to Ensemble Disagreement, by Mina Mirzadehsarcheshmeh and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

工程师进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2609.05676v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models adapted on private text are often served through APIs, so privacy leakage occurs through generated outputs rather t…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。