跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
站内改写3 分钟阅读

待翻译:OpenAI Releases GPT-6 Sol and Luna: 50% Cheaper API Pricing and Benchmarks

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:OpenAI has released GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, 2 lower-cost models trained with methods similar to GPT-6 Astra. Sol costs $2/$10 and Luna $0.10/$0.50 per 1M tokens. Both are available now in the API, ChatGPT Work and Codex. They come with improved prompt caching for long-running agents. The post OpenAI Releases GPT-6 Sol and Luna: 50% Cheaper API Pricing and Benchmarks appeared first on MarkTechPost.

来源MarkTechPost作者: Sana Hassan
待翻译:OpenAI Releases GPT-6 Sol and Luna: 50% Cheaper API Pricing and Benchmarks
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

OpenAI has released GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, 2 new models in its GPT-6 family. They sit below GPT-6 Astra, which launched earlier this month. OpenAI trained both with methods similar to Astra’s. The aim is to bring Astra’s advances to faster, more affordable models. Deployable today? Yes. Both models are live in the OpenAI API as gpt-6-sol and gpt-6-luna. They are API-only models, so there are no weights to self-host. Three tiers, one recipe The GPT-6 family now has 3 tiers. Astra is the top model for the hardest work. Sol targets complex coding and professional tasks at lower cost. Luna targets fast, high-volume everyday work. OpenAI team states better caching and inference let it serve these models more cheaply. It is cutting Sol and Luna API prices by 50% against their GPT-5.6 promotional pricing. ModelInput (per 1M tokens)Output (per 1M tokens) GPT-6 Astra$10.00$50.00 GPT-6 Sol$2.00 (was $4)$10.00 (was $20) GPT-6 Luna$0.10 (was $0.20)$0.50 (was $1.20) One detail is worth noting. Luna’s output price falls from $1.20 to $0.50, a cut of about 58%, not 50%. Benchmarks: what OpenAI reports Professional work: On AutomationBench 1.0.6, Sol at xhigh effort scores 33.2% at $0.27 per task. Claude Opus 5 at max effort scores 26.9% at 11.1x that cost. Low-effort Astra scores 30.3% at 3.9x Sol’s cost. Luna at high effort gains 5.4 points over its predecessor at 58% lower cost per task. On Agents’ Last Exam, Sol at max effort scores 56.4%. That beats Claude Opus 5’s best score at 60% lower cost per task. Coding: On DeepSWE v1.1, Sol at max effort scores 68.8%. That is 1.1 points behind Claude Fable 5 at xhigh, at about 80% lower cost per task. Luna at max effort scores 66.6%, comparable to Opus 5 and Fable 5 at medium effort. In those comparisons, Luna costs 93% less per task than Opus 5 and 96% less than Fable 5. On FrontierCode 1.1 Main, which grades whether code is ready to merge, Sol matches Claude Fable 5.1 at xhigh at much lower cost. Computer use: On OSWorld 2.0 offline, Sol at xhigh scores 60.5% versus 60.3% for Opus 5 at medium. Sol’s cost per task is about 80% lower. Luna at max beats GPT-5.6 Sol at medium for 1/10 of the cost. Factuality: OpenAI’s internal test uses de-identified ChatGPT conversations where users flagged model errors. Sol makes about half as many mistakes as its predecessor. Luna at higher effort matches GPT-5.6 Sol at about 1/100 of its cost. OpenAI also carried Astra’s communication style over. Expect clearer, slightly shorter answers with less jargon, especially in coding conversations. Prompt caching for long-running agents Agents resend the same instructions, tools and history on every turn. GPT-6 ships an improved prompt caching system with higher cache hit rates by default. Cached input reads get discounts of up to 90%. Eligible shared prefixes reused within a 30-minute window now qualify. New controls for developers: A Prompt Caching Dashboard tracks hit rates over time. A diagnostics tool explains misses, for example "reason": "tools_changed". Explicit breakpoints let you choose where a cached prefix ends. Reasoning effort can change mid-conversation via configuration_update without breaking cache. allowed_tools restricts callable tools while keeping definitions stable. Prewarming prepares known context before the first user request. The full prompt caching guide covers each pattern. GitHub reports these changes cut the share of prompt tokens needing fresh processing by more than 50%, helping Copilot respond faster. Availability API: gpt-6-sol and gpt-6-luna. ChatGPT Work and Codex: Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu users. Free and Go: Luna in the ChatGPT desktop app. Not yet in Chat. The ChatGPT rollout is gradual through launch day. Interactive Explainer Key Takeaways Sol costs $2/$10 and Luna $0.10/$0.50 per 1M tokens. Sol at xhigh beats Opus 5 max on AutomationBench at 9% of the cost. Luna scores 66.6% on DeepSWE v1.1, costing 93% less per task than Opus 5. Cached input reads get up to 90% off, with new cache controls. Both are live in the API, ChatGPT Work and Codex; not yet in Chat. Check out the Technical Blog. All credit goes to the researcher of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well. Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.? Connect with us The post OpenAI Releases GPT-6 Sol and Luna: 50% Cheaper API Pricing and Benchmarks appeared first on MarkTechPost.

展开要点与分析

文章情报

工程师进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • OpenAI has released GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, 2 lower-cost models trained with methods similar to GPT-6 Astra. Sol costs $2/$10 and Luna $0.10/$0.50 per 1M tokens. Both are availa…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。