AI News HubLIVE
サイト内リライト3 分で読了

翻訳待ち:On Cross-Validation for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Learning Image Classifiers

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2608.14705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) can materially affect the performance of deep learning (DL) image classifiers, but there is little empirical guidance on how to derive the validation signal that drives it, especially for the small sample sizes common in fields such as medical imaging. We compared three HPO protocols in terms of {\em absolute performance-estimation error} (AEE; the absolute difference between the winning configuration's validation AUROC and its test AUROC): fixed holdout (F), reshuffled holdout (R), and 5-fold cross-validation (C). The search space, sampler, training procedure, architecture, and test set were held identical across protocols. We evaluated the protocols on three public datasets spanning two regimes: binary medical imaging (RSNA pneumonia radiographs and binarized HAM10000 skin lesions) and 200-class natural imaging (Tiny ImageNet), across a range of development set sizes $n$ and two backbones (ResNet-18 on all datasets, Vision Transformer (ViT-S/16) on RSNA). On the medical datasets, every point estimate favored cross-validation over both holdout protocols, with reductions in AEE largest at small sample sizes and diminishing as $n$ increased. This pattern remained robust under conservative family-wise adjustment. On Tiny ImageNet, AEE was negligible under all three protocols. Test AUROC was generally similar among protocols. Fixed holdout had lower mean AEE than reshuffled holdout in 11 of 12 medical conditions, although this secondary finding was less uniformly supported. For small-sample medical image classification, we recommend cross-validation-based HPO when computational resources permit because it trades additional computation for a more reliable development-time estimate of subsequent test performance.

ソースarXiv Computer Vision著者: Ljubomir Buturovic (East Palo Alto, United States)

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

--> [Submitted on 10 Aug 2026] Title:On Cross-Validation for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Learning Image Classifiers View a PDF of the paper titled On Cross-Validation for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Learning Image Classifiers, by Ljubomir Buturovic (East Palo Alto and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) can materially affect the performance of deep learning (DL) image classifiers, but there is little empirical guidance on how to derive the validation signal that drives it, especially for the small sample sizes common in fields such as medical imaging. We compared three HPO protocols in terms of {\em absolute performance-estimation error} (AEE; the absolute difference between the winning configuration's validation AUROC and its test AUROC): fixed holdout (F), reshuffled holdout (R), and 5-fold cross-validation (C). The search space, sampler, training procedure, architecture, and test set were held identical across protocols. We evaluated the protocols on three public datasets spanning two regimes: binary medical imaging (RSNA pneumonia radiographs and binarized HAM10000 skin lesions) and 200-class natural imaging (Tiny ImageNet), across a range of development set sizes $n$ and two backbones (ResNet-18 on all datasets, Vision Transformer (ViT-S/16) on RSNA). On the medical datasets, every point estimate favored cross-validation over both holdout protocols, with reductions in AEE largest at small sample sizes and diminishing as $n$ increased. This pattern remained robust under conservative family-wise adjustment. On Tiny ImageNet, AEE was negligible under all three protocols. Test AUROC was generally similar among protocols. Fixed holdout had lower mean AEE than reshuffled holdout in 11 of 12 medical conditions, although this secondary finding was less uniformly supported. For small-sample medical image classification, we recommend cross-validation-based HPO when computational resources permit because it trades additional computation for a more reliable development-time estimate of subsequent test performance. Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.14705 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2608.14705v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14705 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Ljubomir Buturovic [view email] [v1] Mon, 10 Aug 2026 22:44:42 UTC (379 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled On Cross-Validation for Hyperparameter Optimization of Deep Learning Image Classifiers, by Ljubomir Buturovic (East Palo Alto and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Ancillary-file links: Ancillary files (details): README.md bham/dataset_info.json bham/split_manifest.csv bham_cv.sh bham_rf.sh build_bham.py crossed_inference.py cvdl.py cvdl_parser.py dl_tin.py family.py familywise_aee/checkpoints.csv familywise_aee/familywise_aee_inference.csv familywise_aee/summary.md main_logs.sh make_rsnap_splits.py results.csv results/bham1000cv.csv results/bham1000cv_best.csv results/bham1000rf.csv results/bham1000rf_best.csv results/bham100cv.csv results/bham100cv_best.csv results/bham100rf.csv results/bham100rf_best.csv results/bham3000cv.csv results/bham3000cv_best.csv results/bham3000rf.csv results/bham3000rf_best.csv results/bham300cv.csv results/bham300cv_best.csv results/bham300rf.csv results/bham300rf_best.csv results/r1000cv.csv results/r1000cv_best.csv results/r1000rf.csv results/r1000rf_best.csv results/r100cv.csv results/r100cv_best.csv results/r100rf.csv results/r100rf_best.csv results/r3000cv.csv results/r3000cv_best.csv results/r3000rf.csv results/r3000rf_best.csv results/r300cv.csv results/r300cv_best.csv results/r300rf.csv results/r300rf_best.csv results/rvit1000cv.csv results/rvit1000cv_best.csv results/rvit1000rf.csv results/rvit1000rf_best.csv results/rvit100cv.csv results/rvit100cv_best.csv results/rvit100rf.csv results/rvit100rf_best.csv results/rvit3000cv.csv results/rvit3000cv_best.csv results/rvit3000rf.csv results/rvit3000rf_best.csv results/rvit300cv.csv results/rvit300cv_best.csv results/rvit300rf.csv results/rvit300rf_best.csv results/tin10000cv.csv results/tin10000cv_best.csv results/tin10000rf.csv results/tin10000rf_best.csv results/tin2000cv.csv results/tin2000cv_best.csv results/tin2000rf.csv results/tin2000rf_best.csv results/tin5000cv.csv results/tin5000cv_best.csv results/tin5000rf.csv results/tin5000rf_best.csv results_abs.pdf results_best.csv results_full_inference.csv rsnap_cv.sh rsnap_image.py sus.py symmetric_rsnap_rf.sh symmetric_tin_rf.sh tin_cv.sh tin_sus.py tin_test.py tin_top1.csv wds.py (85 additional files not shown) Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)