待翻译：MemArena: An Ego-Centric Benchmark for On-Device Agentic Personal Memory Assistants at Scale
AI 服务暂时不可用，以下为来源摘要，待恢复后补全翻译：arXiv:2608.02613v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Edge-deployed personal memory assistants must handle private interpersonal conversations on-device with open-weight models. Yet, existing memory benchmarks often under-test the combination of activity-dense interaction, ego-centric perspective, and coherent multi-session worlds. MemArena fills these gaps with a single-world conversational benchmark built with its MASim agent simulator, for 50 agents over 15 days (10.3M dialog-text tokens, 24.1K text-only ego-observed tokens/agent/day). With the interaction history, it co-generates ground truth over six recall, reasoning, and trustworthiness evaluation dimensions. We evaluate five open-weight readers with Vanilla context, BM25-RAG, Oracle retrieval, Memobase, and MemSearch as memory backends. Three results stand out: (1) Memory-backend choice matters more for content accuracy: At Qwen3-0.6B, Memobase-to-MemSearch gains +32.5/+19.2 pp, exceeding MemSearch reader scaling (+10.6/+6.8 pp). (2) Permission-aware access fails universally, with Oracle leaking heavily and other backends too timid to disclose. (3) Search latency bites only at very small reader: on a Spark GB10 edge node, memory-search adds a moderate and fixed 87/7/48 ms (BM25-RAG/Memobase/MemSearch) that composes a small part of TTFT for most reader-backend combinations. Code, the MASim simulator, and the MemArena-L benchmark will be released upon acceptance.
AI 服务暂时不可用，以下为来源正文，待恢复后补全翻译。
--> [Submitted on 20 May 2026] Title:MemArena: An Ego-Centric Benchmark for On-Device Agentic Personal Memory Assistants at Scale View a PDF of the paper titled MemArena: An Ego-Centric Benchmark for On-Device Agentic Personal Memory Assistants at Scale, by Jiadong Zhang and Xiaosong Ma View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Edge-deployed personal memory assistants must handle private interpersonal conversations on-device with open-weight models. Yet, existing memory benchmarks often under-test the combination of activity-dense interaction, ego-centric perspective, and coherent multi-session worlds. MemArena fills these gaps with a single-world conversational benchmark built with its MASim agent simulator, for 50 agents over 15 days (10.3M dialog-text tokens, 24.1K text-only ego-observed tokens/agent/day). With the interaction history, it co-generates ground truth over six recall, reasoning, and trustworthiness evaluation dimensions. We evaluate five open-weight readers with Vanilla context, BM25-RAG, Oracle retrieval, Memobase, and MemSearch as memory backends. Three results stand out: (1) Memory-backend choice matters more for content accuracy: At Qwen3-0.6B, Memobase-to-MemSearch gains +32.5/+19.2 pp, exceeding MemSearch reader scaling (+10.6/+6.8 pp). (2) Permission-aware access fails universally, with Oracle leaking heavily and other backends too timid to disclose. (3) Search latency bites only at very small reader: on a Spark GB10 edge node, memory-search adds a moderate and fixed 87/7/48 ms (BM25-RAG/Memobase/MemSearch) that composes a small part of TTFT for most reader-backend combinations. Code, the MASim simulator, and the MemArena-L benchmark will be released upon acceptance. Comments: 48 pages, 6 figures Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2608.02613 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2608.02613v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02613 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jiadong Zhang [view email] [v1] Wed, 20 May 2026 17:07:32 UTC (1,663 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled MemArena: An Ego-Centric Benchmark for On-Device Agentic Personal Memory Assistants at Scale, by Jiadong Zhang and Xiaosong Ma View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.LG cs.MA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)