本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Local Edits, Global Ripples: Replay-Informed Policy Adaptation for Workflow Synthesis

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2609.12127v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prompt-policy editing offers a practical way to improve agents that synthesize executable workflows without updating the underlying model. However, persistent prompt editing has two coupled properties. First, edit locality does not imply effect locality: an edit confined to one policy segment can ripple through downstream execution, altering behavior beyond the edited segment. Second, edit effects are composition-sensitive: edits that work in isolation can interfere after composition, causing one or both to lose their benefit or become harmful. Persistent adaptation must therefore support two distinct decisions: identifying where the policy should change from execution feedback, and determining whether…

ソースarXiv Computational Linguistics著者: Manqing Mao, Hong Wang, Samson Koelle, Jie Yuan, Zhuoer Wang, James Feng, Yanjun Lin, Daniel Edmiston, Nikki Lijing Kuang, Zhecheng Sheng, Wei Niu
翻訳待ち:Local Edits, Global Ripples: Replay-Informed Policy Adaptation for Workflow Synthesis
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 10 Sep 2026] Title:Local Edits, Global Ripples: Replay-Informed Policy Adaptation for Workflow Synthesis View a PDF of the paper titled Local Edits, Global Ripples: Replay-Informed Policy Adaptation for Workflow Synthesis, by Manqing Mao and 10 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Prompt-policy editing offers a practical way to improve agents that synthesize executable workflows without updating the underlying model. However, persistent prompt editing has two coupled properties. First, edit locality does not imply effect locality: an edit confined to one policy segment can ripple through downstream execution, altering behavior beyond the edited segment. Second, edit effects are composition-sensitive: edits that work in isolation can interfere after composition, causing one or both to lose their benefit or become harmful. Persistent adaptation must therefore support two distinct decisions: identifying where the policy should change from execution feedback, and determining whether the resulting edit remains safe to persist after composition. To address these challenges, we introduce RIPPLE (Replay-Informed Persistent Policy Localization and Editing), which separates where an edit is made from whether it remains safe after composition. It diagnoses failed trajectories, maps each actionable failure to a predefined policy segment, and restricts the correction to that part of the policy. RIPPLE then evaluates candidates against the same iteration-start policy to compare their isolated gains, before replaying promising edits after previously accepted updates to expose downstream effects and interactions. Only edits that remain safe under composition are retained. We evaluate RIPPLE on Flow-HO, a synthetic held-out benchmark for executable workflow synthesis. RIPPLE improves validation success by up to 23.1% and yields positive gains on two additional frozen language-model backbones, while maintaining edit efficiency and low execution cost. Targeted interaction analysis further demonstrates both properties: a segment-local tool-use edit changes downstream resource resolution and validation, while an edit beneficial in isolation becomes harmful after composition. Comments: 33 pages, 20 tables, 6 figures Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Software Engineering (cs.SE) Cite as: arXiv:2609.12127 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.12127v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12127 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Manqing Mao [view email] [v1] Thu, 10 Sep 2026 18:55:19 UTC (1,643 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Local Edits, Global Ripples: Replay-Informed Policy Adaptation for Workflow Synthesis, by Manqing Mao and 10 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

エンジニア上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2609.12127v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prompt-policy editing offers a practical way to improve agents that synthesize executable workflows without updating the underlying…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。