跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.22526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision models, non-generative scorers that report a probability over caller-supplied options and emit no text, are increasingly deployed as routers, classifiers and guardrails. Because they generate nothing, rationales and chain-of-thought do not apply. We audit three: an encoder scorer, a decoder scorer and a closed API, entirely through interventions on their input, using expert-annotated Bengali idioms carrying a gold figurative and a gold literal gloss. Dropping an idiom's own literal gloss into the option list draws every arm toward it, taking 65% to 96% of each arm's remaining Bengali errors. A model-by-language matrix over one shared item set shows how far this depends on the test language: every arm is 1…

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Adib Sakhawat, Syed Rifat Raiyan
待翻譯:Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 15 Oct 2026] Title:Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms View a PDF of the paper titled Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms, by Adib Sakhawat and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Decision models, non-generative scorers that report a probability over caller-supplied options and emit no text, are increasingly deployed as routers, classifiers and guardrails. Because they generate nothing, rationales and chain-of-thought do not apply. We audit three: an encoder scorer, a decoder scorer and a closed API, entirely through interventions on their input, using expert-annotated Bengali idioms carrying a gold figurative and a gold literal gloss. Dropping an idiom's own literal gloss into the option list draws every arm toward it, taking 65% to 96% of each arm's remaining Bengali errors. A model-by-language matrix over one shared item set shows how far this depends on the test language: every arm is 1.9 to 6.4 times more captured in Bengali than in English on the same paired entries, the commercial model's apparent resistance is a property of its test language, and capability does not order the failure. Calibration degrades in all three arms, and on the open arms confidence inverts, so gating on it is worse than gating at random. On a semantics-free option list, where accuracy is at chance, the best-calibrated arm still reports mean confidence 0.82. Code and data: this https URL. Comments: Under review, 33 pages, 12 figures, 22 tables Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2610.22526 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.22526v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22526 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Syed Rifat Raiyan [view email] [v1] Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:19:02 UTC (1,631 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Literal Lock-In: How Test Language Shifts Literal Attraction in Typed Decision Models on Bengali Idioms, by Adib Sakhawat and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

研究者進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2610.22526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision models, non-generative scorers that report a probability over caller-supplied options and emit no text, are increasingly d…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。