翻訳待ち：Large Language Models Threaten Double-blind Review

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

--> [Submitted on 23 May 2026] Title:Large Language Models Threaten Double-blind Review View a PDF of the paper titled Large Language Models Threaten Double-blind Review, by Bulambo Mwendelwa Gloire and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Double blind peer review serves as the scientific community primary defense against status and affiliation bias. Its effectiveness rests on the assumption that anonymized manuscripts convey scientific merit without revealing their authors. While authorship can often be recovered using citation networks or stylistic markers, we show that this assumption is increasingly fragile in the presence of large language models (LLMs). Using only titles and abstracts from papers published after model training, we find that LLMs collapse anonymity more efficiently than humans, with belief concentrating onto a small subset of plausible authors drawn from pools of five domain expert candidates. This vulnerability persists even when stylistic and bibliographic cues are excluded, indicating that stable patterns in problem framing and research focus function as latent conceptual signatures of authorship. Together, these findings indicate that double blind review is vulnerable to automated semantic inference, necessitating a revaluation of how anonymity and fairness are maintained in an AI augmented research ecosystem. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.05157 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2608.05157v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05157 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Bulambo Mwendelwa Gloire [view email] [v1] Sat, 23 May 2026 15:00:39 UTC (417 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Large Language Models Threaten Double-blind Review, by Bulambo Mwendelwa Gloire and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)