AI News HubLIVE
サイト内リライト2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Impact of Dataset Composition on Embedded Real-Time UAV Wildfire Detection Using Compact YOLO Models

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2608.07554v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The development of vision-based wildfire detection systems for unmanned aerial vehicles is constrained by the limited availability of diverse real-world training images. This paper investigates the impact of dataset composition on embedded real-time UAV wildfire detection using compact YOLO models as a controlled validation family. Four training configurations were evaluated: real non-augmented, real augmented, hybrid non-augmented, and hybrid augmented, where the hybrid sets combine real wildfire images with AI-generated samples. The objective is to determine whether synthetic data mixing and image augmentation improve practical detection performance under resource-constrained deployment conditions. Experimental results show that the best overall operating point was obtained with the real non-augmented dataset, which achieved the strongest balance between recall and mean average precision for UAV-based wildfire detection. The results also show that neither hybridization with synthetic data nor augmentation produced a better final deployment choice. These findings suggest that, for embedded UAV wildfire detection, dataset realism and domain alignment are more valuable than increasing training set size through synthetic expansion.

ソースarXiv Computer Vision著者: Eduardo de los Santos, Andre S. Kelbouscas, Ricardo B. Grando, Bruna V. Guterres

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

--> [Submitted on 1 Aug 2026] Title:Impact of Dataset Composition on Embedded Real-Time UAV Wildfire Detection Using Compact YOLO Models View a PDF of the paper titled Impact of Dataset Composition on Embedded Real-Time UAV Wildfire Detection Using Compact YOLO Models, by Eduardo de los Santos and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The development of vision-based wildfire detection systems for unmanned aerial vehicles is constrained by the limited availability of diverse real-world training images. This paper investigates the impact of dataset composition on embedded real-time UAV wildfire detection using compact YOLO models as a controlled validation family. Four training configurations were evaluated: real non-augmented, real augmented, hybrid non-augmented, and hybrid augmented, where the hybrid sets combine real wildfire images with AI-generated samples. The objective is to determine whether synthetic data mixing and image augmentation improve practical detection performance under resource-constrained deployment conditions. Experimental results show that the best overall operating point was obtained with the real non-augmented dataset, which achieved the strongest balance between recall and mean average precision for UAV-based wildfire detection. The results also show that neither hybridization with synthetic data nor augmentation produced a better final deployment choice. These findings suggest that, for embedded UAV wildfire detection, dataset realism and domain alignment are more valuable than increasing training set size through synthetic expansion. Comments: Paper accepted at the ICCAS 2026 Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO) Cite as: arXiv:2608.07554 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2608.07554v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07554 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Ricardo Grando [view email] [v1] Sat, 1 Aug 2026 21:43:41 UTC (7,283 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Impact of Dataset Composition on Embedded Real-Time UAV Wildfire Detection Using Compact YOLO Models, by Eduardo de los Santos and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.RO References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)