翻訳待ち:From weeks to minutes: How Formula 1® uses agentic AI on AWS to accelerate data operations
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:Formula 1® partnered with AWS to build the Data Accelerator, using agentic AI on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore to transform its MarTech data platform. Learn how F1 cut data source onboarding from up to 8 weeks to about 40 minutes, automated schema evolution, and gained end-to-end observability across its fan-engagement data estate.
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。
Formula 1® (F1) engages an audience of over 800 million fans globally across digital platforms, F1 TV, social media, ticketing, and merchandise year-round. Races happen every two weeks. Fan engagement windows are measured in minutes and commercial decisions need to move at the speed of the grid. Behind the scenes, F1’s marketing technology (MarTech) platform, Customer 360, captures interactions across all of these touchpoints to power personalization, segmentation, and commercial strategy. However, the platform faced a significant operational challenge. According to Chris Roberts, Director of IT at Formula 1, “Our MarTech platform is the nervous system of F1’s fan engagement. But every new data source required 6 to 8 weeks of manual engineering. We had an 18-month backlog just to integrate 12 new sources.” The business was generating data faster than the engineering team could wire it up. As a result, Matt Kemp, F1 Head of Data Operations, set to improve efficiencies and data quality. “Manually ingesting data sources is time consuming, creates solution variances, and ultimately results in data integrity issues. I wanted a solution that was repeatable, robust and reliable. AWS worked backwards from our needs to implement an agentic solution that worked end to end, applying business logic at each step.” In early 2026, F1 and AWS worked together to build the Data Accelerator, a solution that uses agentic AI on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore to transform F1’s MarTech data platform from a manually maintained system into a self-managed, observable, and unified data estate. In this post, we show how the Data Accelerator reduced data source onboarding from up to 8 weeks to approximately 40 minutes of code generation plus hours of deployment. It also identified and fixed data source anomalies in production, tracked data platform operations and agent lineage in a single window, and opened a gateway for analysts, engineers, and scientists to collaborate. “For the first time, we have end-to-end visibility across the entire MarTech platform with data lineage and root cause analysis, not just dashboards full of alerts,” says Roberts. The challenge F1’s Customer 360 platform ingests data from ticketing partners, streaming integrations, sponsor activation feeds, social media, and merchandise systems. Operating a data estate of this breadth and velocity surfaced three areas of friction the team set out to solve. First, onboarding each new data source was a heavily manual effort: engineers wrote schema mappings, built ingestion pipelines, configured data quality checks, defined General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) classifications, and set governance policies by hand. This process took 6 to 8 weeks per source. Second, the platform had to keep pace with constantly evolving upstream feeds. Providers frequently changed column names, added fields, or restructured and rescheduled payloads without notice. Those changes often surfaced at the worst possible moment, such as mid race-weekend or during a mission-critical campaign launch. Third, visibility was fragmented. Logs were scattered across services with no unified data lineage. When a stakeholder questioned a metric, engineers spent hours manually tracing the issue across Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) paths, Amazon Redshift control tables, Airflow logs, and DBT outputs. Solution overview The Data Accelerator addressed these challenges through five workstreams delivered simultaneously: Agentic data source onboarding using Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, hosting agents in its runtime containers. Automated schema evolution detection and remediation. Unified data access through Amazon SageMaker Unified Studio. End-to-end observability with root cause analysis tool (RCA) and context graph. Automated identification of a failure in observability dashboard and agentic operation if they could be fixed with code changes. A sixth workstream optimized the customer identity resolution algorithms that unify fan touchpoints across channels. The following sections describe each workstream in detail. Agentic data source onboarding The centerpiece of the Data Accelerator is a set of platform agents that take a Business Requirements Document (BRD) with limited information about the data source and produce a fully production-ready onboarding pipeline. This includes infrastructure code, data transformations, governance policies, and GDPR classification without a human writing a single line of boilerplate. The agents work in two phases: Phase 1: Configuration generation When a new data source needs onboarding, a team member uploads a BRD to an Amazon S3 bucket. The upload triggers an AWS Lambda function, which invokes Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Runtime, a capability of Amazon Bedrock AgentCore. The agent reads the BRD and generates a set of configuration files. It then accesses GitHub through a GitHub App to push these files as a pull request to the standardized Git repository, and accesses Jira through its REST API to create a ticket referencing the PR. All agent conversations and actions are traced in Amazon CloudWatch through built-in AgentCore observability. The assigned engineer reviews, adjusts if necessary, and approves. Phase 1 workflow: a BRD upload triggers the agent to generate config files and open a pull request Phase 2: Full pipeline generation Once the configuration files are approved, a human triggers the next stage. The agent takes the approved configuration and generates three separate Pull Requests: AWS Glue application and infrastructure code. DBT transformation framework. Governance policies including GDPR tagging. All three PRs link to a single Jira ticket for traceability. Engineers review each one across the Infrastructure, DBT, and Governance repositories and approve. Phase 2 workflow: the agent generates infrastructure, transformation, and governance pull requests Automated GDPR classification What distinguishes this from a basic code generator is the integrated GDPR classification. The agent proactively analyzes every data column, determines whether it contains personal data, sensitive personal data, or pseudonymized data, and tags it with the appropriate GDPR category. These tags publish directly to the governance registry in SageMaker Unified Studio, giving the compliance team immediate visibility without manual review cycles. Modular skill architecture The system is not a tightly coupled agent graph. A single agent operates with modular skill definitions, each encapsulating a distinct capability: schema mapping and data type inference, data quality validation, governance enforcement, and sensitive data classification. At runtime, the agent evaluates incoming requirements and activates the relevant skills, composing them through a multi-pass reasoning process. Pass-0 handles token management through scrubbing, Pass-1 summarizes tool outputs, and Pass-2 rolls up an overall assessment, refining accuracy and completeness progressively rather than relying on a one-shot response. New capabilities ship as new skill modules without changing the core agent loop, keeping the architecture maintainable and composable as the platform grows. The result is onboarding time dropped from 6 to 8 weeks to approximately 40 minutes of code generation plus hours of deployment and review. AI agents now handle 95% of the work autonomously. Automated schema evolution Onboarding new data sources is one challenge, but keeping existing integrations healthy is another. Upstream providers frequently modify their data structures, from renaming a column to creating a new field. Previously, the F1 team discovered these changes when a pipeline failed, often during a live race weekend. The same agent architecture that handles onboarding now continuously monitors for upstream schema changes. When a provider modifies their data structure, the agent detects it through event-driven triggers using AWS Lambda and Amazon EventBridge. It assesses the downstream impact, identifying which pipelines are affected, and which consumers depend on the changed fields. It then generates the necessary code updates across all affected repositories and creates a Jira ticket with full context and linked PRs. Engineers receive a notification that explains what changed, describes the impact, and presents a proposed fix for review. End-to-end resolution now takes hours instead of days. Schema evolution agentic workflow Unified data access with Amazon SageMaker Unified Studio Before the Data Accelerator, working with Customer 360 data required navigating multiple disconnected environments. Data engineers curated pipelines in one account. Data scientists who wanted to model fan behavior needed access to a separate account, and analysts operated in a third world entirely. Nobody shared tooling or context, and getting from a question to an answer took days of coordination before any analysis could begin. The solution uses Amazon SageMaker Unified Studio as the foundation for a data mesh framework where a central governance account brokers data discovery and access across multiple producer teams. The key enabler: governance is codified as declarative configuration, not manual console operations. A single data source definition simultaneously publishes data to the catalog and provisions the access control needed for consumers to subscribe. This means agents can safely onboard new data products end-to-end, from storage to catalog to governed access, because the framework enforces security constraints by construction. No human needs to review IAM policies or AWS Lake Formation grants. The platform guarantees correctness structurally. This is what makes the “one front door” possible. Data engineers curate and govern datasets in one place, and data scientists find those same datasets in the same environment: governed, documented, and ready to model. A data scientist building a fan segmentation model or optimizing the customer identity algorithm doesn’t need to know where the data lives, who owns the pipeline, or which S3 prefix to use. They open Unified Studio, find the curated Customer 360 datasets, and start modeling. They get shared notebooks, consistent tooling, and governed access, because declarative governance made safe self-service possible without sacrificing control. The curation and the consumption finally live side by side. End-to-end observability with RCA and context graph A data platform is only as trustworthy as the team’s ability to answer one question: is the data correct right now? Before the Data Accelerator, answering that question meant logging into Apache Airflow, checking Amazon S3 paths, querying Amazon Redshift control tables, and reading DBT logs. “Nobody had the full view. When a stakeholder asked, ‘why does this number look wrong?’ the answer was always, ‘give us a few hours.’ The observability dashboard changes that entirely,” adds Roberts. The observability layer presents full data lineage from S3 Raw ingestion through Processed layers into Amazon Redshift DBT stages as a single interactive graph, color-coded for health. Users click on any node to drill down to individual sources and tables, each showing pass/fail status, last run time, and duration. If a pipeline fails, the lineage visualization shows exactly where the break occurred, and which downstream data is affected. Root cause analysis (RCA) is an agentic tool within F1’s platform that reads system logs and identifies failure points across the data estate. On its own, RCA can tell you what failed. We augment the RCA tool by passing through business context and system topology, codified as JSON. A missing file in S3 might be the error, but with the context graph, RCA tells you that the upstream provider rescheduled their delivery window, which is why the file wasn’t there when the pipeline ran. That’s the difference between knowing what fail [truncated for AI cost control]