跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2610.00015v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-language-model agents can propose and execute actions, but proposal, authority, dispatch, verified external effect, and serving promotion are different claims. We present Praxa, an agent harness that represents these states explicitly through deterministic admission, brokered execution, external read-back, reconciliation, and reviewed promotion. We report four evidence lanes. First, an author-run repository-local audit at a pinned revision passed 1,027/1,027 unit tests and 89/89 Workerd tests, instrumented all 363 expected source files, and met four coverage floors; raw per-test transcripts and independent reproduction are unavailable. Second, in a provider-backed Terminal-Bench Core 0.1.1 pilot across 12 cu…

来源arXiv AI作者: Stefan G. Creadore
待翻译:From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 27 Jul 2026] Title:From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution View a PDF of the paper titled From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution, by Stefan G. Creadore View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large-language-model agents can propose and execute actions, but proposal, authority, dispatch, verified external effect, and serving promotion are different claims. We present Praxa, an agent harness that represents these states explicitly through deterministic admission, brokered execution, external read-back, reconciliation, and reviewed promotion. We report four evidence lanes. First, an author-run repository-local audit at a pinned revision passed 1,027/1,027 unit tests and 89/89 Workerd tests, instrumented all 363 expected source files, and met four coverage floors; raw per-test transcripts and independent reproduction are unavailable. Second, in a provider-backed Terminal-Bench Core 0.1.1 pilot across 12 curated tasks, baseline and reliability-layer arms each passed 17/36 strict trials. The reliability layer used 37.49% more input and 50.73% more output tokens, so the pilot does not support superiority. Third, in a post-debug, two-order coordination-proxy development comparison, baseline and a source-authored candidate each completed 180/180 trials with equal measured accuracy, full hermetic crash recovery, and zero protected violations. The candidate used 37.11% fewer tokens, 33.84% lower estimated endpoint cost, and 11.63% fewer steps; this does not establish improved quality, latency, or production behavior. Fourth, deployed source/configuration evidence shows bounded reflection, recall accounting, memory compilation, and tool-health paths, but no production outcome lift. Praxa's supported contribution is an evidence-bound architecture that makes authority-to-effect transitions explicit and testable. Current evidence does not establish adversarial security, production safety, general specialist superiority, autonomous recursive optimization, or user benefit. Comments: 30 pages, 8 figures. Engineering validation and descriptive pilot. Public artifacts: this https URL Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2610.00015 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2610.00015v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00015 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Stefan Creadore [view email] [v1] Mon, 27 Jul 2026 05:57:10 UTC (191 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution, by Stefan G. Creadore View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

工程师进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2610.00015v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-language-model agents can propose and execute actions, but proposal, authority, dispatch, verified external effect, and servi…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。