跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.17538v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for structured information extraction from documents, yet their behavior under realistic OCR noise remains poorly understood. We present a systematic benchmark of open-source instruction-tuned LLMs for key-value pair (KVP) extraction under both clean-text and noisy OCR conditions. We evaluate representative decoder-only models (Gemma, Mistral, Qwen2.5, LLaMA 3, and DeepSeek) on the FUNSD, CORD, and SROIE benchmarks using both Gold-text annotations and OCR outputs from PaddleOCR, EasyOCR, and Tesseract. A unified evaluation protocol isolates the effects of input quality, model design, and prompting under consistent conditions. The results show that modern LLMs act…

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Zahra Anvari, Vassilis Athitsos
待翻譯:From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 14 Jul 2026] Title:From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings View a PDF of the paper titled From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings, by Zahra Anvari and Vassilis Athitsos View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for structured information extraction from documents, yet their behavior under realistic OCR noise remains poorly understood. We present a systematic benchmark of open-source instruction-tuned LLMs for key-value pair (KVP) extraction under both clean-text and noisy OCR conditions. We evaluate representative decoder-only models (Gemma, Mistral, Qwen2.5, LLaMA 3, and DeepSeek) on the FUNSD, CORD, and SROIE benchmarks using both Gold-text annotations and OCR outputs from PaddleOCR, EasyOCR, and Tesseract. A unified evaluation protocol isolates the effects of input quality, model design, and prompting under consistent conditions. The results show that modern LLMs act as strong semantic extractors when high-quality text is available, in some cases approaching supervised layout-aware systems. Under OCR noise, however, performance degrades substantially and performance gaps between models narrow as input corruption increases. Across all datasets, extraction performance is governed by two factors: semantic reasoning over text and preservation of textual fidelity under OCR noise. While larger models improve results on clean text, these gains diminish under noisy inputs, where OCR quality becomes the dominant factor. We also identify recurring failure modes, including key-value misalignment, hallucination, and numeric corruption. Our findings highlight the gap between clean-text evaluation and real-world deployment, emphasizing the need to jointly improve OCR quality, structural reasoning, and LLM-based semantic modeling. Comments: 25 pages, 20 tables, 5 figures Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.17538 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.17538v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17538 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Zahra Anvari [view email] [v1] Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:20:43 UTC (10,830 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled From Pixels to Pairs: A Comprehensive Benchmark of LLM-Based Key-Value Extraction in Noisy Document Settings, by Zahra Anvari and Vassilis Athitsos View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CV References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

投資人進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2609.17538v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for structured information extraction from documents, yet their behavior under r…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。