翻訳待ち：Finite Constant Frontiers and Auditable Regret Certificates for Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要：arXiv:2608.07725v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Average-reward reinforcement-learning regret is known up to logarithmic factors, but the numerical content of published guarantees is difficult to compare because probability mode, structural parameter, logarithmic normalization, prior information, and planning assumptions differ. We introduce a constant-aware comparison protocol and derive an explicit finite lower certificate for communicating MDPs. The construction is a binary tree of two-state blocks; its proof uses exact trajectory-level Bernoulli KL divergence and keeps action budget, diameter, occupancy, navigation cost, and terminal bias explicit. A common closed-form envelope improves the published coefficient $0.015$ across a finite frontier: $0.0200$ in a moderate regime and up to $0.0291$ under stronger action, diameter, and horizon conditions, a $94\%$ increase. The limiting coefficient is $\frac1{32}\sqrt{(A-3)/A}$. For upper bounds, we give an auditable composition rule for a span-constrained optimistic learner, but do not claim a coefficient while adaptive directional-variance and planning certificates remain open. We also formalize valid expectation conversion and constant comparability. Controlled diagnostics test diameter dependence, bonus-by-width interactions, span misspecification, and the finite lower certificate on its exact family.
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。
--> [Submitted on 7 Aug 2026] Title:Finite Constant Frontiers and Auditable Regret Certificates for Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning View a PDF of the paper titled Finite Constant Frontiers and Auditable Regret Certificates for Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning, by Ibne Farabi Shihab and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Average-reward reinforcement-learning regret is known up to logarithmic factors, but the numerical content of published guarantees is difficult to compare because probability mode, structural parameter, logarithmic normalization, prior information, and planning assumptions differ. We introduce a constant-aware comparison protocol and derive an explicit finite lower certificate for communicating MDPs. The construction is a binary tree of two-state blocks; its proof uses exact trajectory-level Bernoulli KL divergence and keeps action budget, diameter, occupancy, navigation cost, and terminal bias explicit. A common closed-form envelope improves the published coefficient $0.015$ across a finite frontier: $0.0200$ in a moderate regime and up to $0.0291$ under stronger action, diameter, and horizon conditions, a $94\%$ increase. The limiting coefficient is $\frac1{32}\sqrt{(A-3)/A}$. For upper bounds, we give an auditable composition rule for a span-constrained optimistic learner, but do not claim a coefficient while adaptive directional-variance and planning certificates remain open. We also formalize valid expectation conversion and constant comparability. Controlled diagnostics test diameter dependence, bonus-by-width interactions, span misspecification, and the finite lower certificate on its exact family. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.07725 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2608.07725v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07725 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Abu Sa-Adat Mohamed Moon-Im Al Ahsan [view email] [v1] Fri, 7 Aug 2026 19:28:58 UTC (50 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Finite Constant Frontiers and Auditable Regret Certificates for Average-Reward Reinforcement Learning, by Ibne Farabi Shihab and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)