跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Fed-Equilibrium Framework for Topological Pareto Control in Robust and Fair Clinical Federated Learning

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.11937v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The deployment of Federated Learning (FL) in multi-center clinical networks faces the challenge of "knowledge dominance," where high-volume hubs naturally overwhelm minority community nodes, implicitly treating the distinct clinical patterns of smaller cohorts as outliers. Existing geometric defenses provide a security baseline but leave this efficiency-fairness dilemma unresolved. To bridge this gap, we propose Fed-Equilibrium, a framework that advances the paradigm from simple defense to topological equilibrium. Unlike traditional aggregators, Fed-Equilibrium implements a sequential architectural synergy. It utilizes a two-stage gradient control cascade: Stage I (geometric quality assurance) enforces directional…

來源arXiv Machine Learning作者: Ting Xu, Henry Leung
待翻譯:Fed-Equilibrium Framework for Topological Pareto Control in Robust and Fair Clinical Federated Learning
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 3 Jul 2026] Title:Fed-Equilibrium Framework for Topological Pareto Control in Robust and Fair Clinical Federated Learning View a PDF of the paper titled Fed-Equilibrium Framework for Topological Pareto Control in Robust and Fair Clinical Federated Learning, by Ting Xu and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The deployment of Federated Learning (FL) in multi-center clinical networks faces the challenge of "knowledge dominance," where high-volume hubs naturally overwhelm minority community nodes, implicitly treating the distinct clinical patterns of smaller cohorts as outliers. Existing geometric defenses provide a security baseline but leave this efficiency-fairness dilemma unresolved. To bridge this gap, we propose Fed-Equilibrium, a framework that advances the paradigm from simple defense to topological equilibrium. Unlike traditional aggregators, Fed-Equilibrium implements a sequential architectural synergy. It utilizes a two-stage gradient control cascade: Stage I (geometric quality assurance) enforces directional consistency via a cosine similarity funnel to filter malicious noise, creating a stabilized manifold; Stage II (topological Pareto control) then actively modulates verified contributions by identifying the optimal Pareto knee point. We validated this framework on a bi-national simulation integrating Canadian (CNODES) and U.S. (SyntheticMass) registries. Experimental results demonstrate that the system simultaneously secures the network against adversarial divergence while accommodating underrepresented signals. Notably, the minority U.S. spoke (representing less than 3% of data volume) achieved deep convergence comparable to the data-rich Canadian hub. This confirms that Fed-Equilibrium effectively counters "knowledge dominance," establishing a true "knowledge commons" where global generalizability does not come at the cost of local clinical representation. Comments: Accepted to the IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE 2026) Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC) Cite as: arXiv:2609.11937 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2609.11937v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.11937 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Ting Xu [view email] [v1] Fri, 3 Jul 2026 19:42:24 UTC (3,719 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Fed-Equilibrium Framework for Topological Pareto Control in Robust and Fair Clinical Federated Learning, by Ting Xu and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.DC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

研究者進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2609.11937v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The deployment of Federated Learning (FL) in multi-center clinical networks faces the challenge of "knowledge dominance," where hig…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。