跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:Evaluating the Effects of Prompt Perturbation on Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2609.35804v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing tasks, leading to their widespread deployment as intelligent assistants in decision-making contexts. However, the increasing complexity of these models raises concerns about their reliability, particularly regarding bias and hallucination. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of LLMs to perturbed variations of the original inquiry in decision-making tasks. We show that contrary to previous studies, perturbations can mitigate bias and hallucination in some LLMs over other models. It's found that Claude 3 is more effective for the tasks represented in most datasets, whereas models like GPT3.5 exhibit varying le…

来源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Mamehgol Yousefi, Ahmad Shahi, Mos Sharifi, Alvaro Romera, Simon Hoermann, Tham Piumsomboon
待翻译:Evaluating the Effects of Prompt Perturbation on Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 18 Sep 2026] Title:Evaluating the Effects of Prompt Perturbation on Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating the Effects of Prompt Perturbation on Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models, by Mamehgol Yousefi and 5 other authors View PDF Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing tasks, leading to their widespread deployment as intelligent assistants in decision-making contexts. However, the increasing complexity of these models raises concerns about their reliability, particularly regarding bias and hallucination. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of LLMs to perturbed variations of the original inquiry in decision-making tasks. We show that contrary to previous studies, perturbations can mitigate bias and hallucination in some LLMs over other models. It's found that Claude 3 is more effective for the tasks represented in most datasets, whereas models like GPT3.5 exhibit varying levels of adequacy, performing comparably in some cases but falling significantly behind in others. These insights are crucial for understanding the practical implications of deploying LLM-based assistants as effective decision-support tools in real-world applications, emphasising the need for rigorous testing and validation to ensure reliability and effectiveness. This study contributes to the growing body of research on LLM evaluation and provides insights for developing more robust and trustworthy AI assistants in critical decision-making contexts. Comments: 14 pages. Published in ICONIP 2024 (Neural Information Processing), LNCS 15290, Springer Nature, 2025 Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2609.35804 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.35804v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35804 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Journal reference: Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2024), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 15290, pp. 361-374, Springer, 2025 Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6588-4_25 DOI(s) linking to related resources Submission history From: Ahmad Shahi [view email] [v1] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:25:05 UTC (119 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating the Effects of Prompt Perturbation on Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models, by Mamehgol Yousefi and 5 other authors View PDF TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.HC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

投资人进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2609.35804v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing tasks, leading to their wide…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。