AI News HubLIVE
サイト内リライト2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Evaluating OpenAI's Privacy Filter: Cross-Lingual, Cross-Domain PII Detection Across 42 Benchmarks

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2608.02616v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present the first independent, systematic evaluation of OpenAI's Privacy Filter (OPF), a 1.5B-parameter bidirectional PII detector, across 42 synthetic benchmarks spanning 22 languages and 5 domains. Zero-shot, OPF achieves F1=0.855 on AI4Privacy and 0.464 on SPY medical, outperforming Presidio (0.431, 0.273) and XLM-RoBERTa (0.269, 0.111) on PII-annotated benchmarks; on multilingual NER, XLM-RoBERTa leads OPF on all 13 Indic and non-Latin languages. GPT-4o leads on medical, legal, and financial PII (SPY: 0.643 avg, Gretel: 0.527), while OPF leads on structured synthetic PII (0.71 avg) and customer support (0.60). OPF degrades sharply when PII is embedded in narrative prose: F1=0.04--0.57 on NER benchmarks and collapse for non-Latin scripts (Arabic: 0.04, Cyrillic: 0.03). Error analysis shows OPF is strongest on structurally regular PII types (email: 0.78, phone: 0.76) and weakest on culturally variable ones (person: 0.40, address: 0.49), and is recall-biased on customer-support and medical/legal PII (P=0.31--0.54, R=0.70--0.85); global precision spans 0.31--0.86 across all domains.

ソースarXiv Computational Linguistics著者: Rohith Uppala

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

--> [Submitted on 23 May 2026] Title:Evaluating OpenAI's Privacy Filter: Cross-Lingual, Cross-Domain PII Detection Across 42 Benchmarks View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating OpenAI's Privacy Filter: Cross-Lingual, Cross-Domain PII Detection Across 42 Benchmarks, by Rohith Uppala View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We present the first independent, systematic evaluation of OpenAI's Privacy Filter (OPF), a 1.5B-parameter bidirectional PII detector, across 42 synthetic benchmarks spanning 22 languages and 5 domains. Zero-shot, OPF achieves F1=0.855 on AI4Privacy and 0.464 on SPY medical, outperforming Presidio (0.431, 0.273) and XLM-RoBERTa (0.269, 0.111) on PII-annotated benchmarks; on multilingual NER, XLM-RoBERTa leads OPF on all 13 Indic and non-Latin languages. GPT-4o leads on medical, legal, and financial PII (SPY: 0.643 avg, Gretel: 0.527), while OPF leads on structured synthetic PII (0.71 avg) and customer support (0.60). OPF degrades sharply when PII is embedded in narrative prose: F1=0.04--0.57 on NER benchmarks and collapse for non-Latin scripts (Arabic: 0.04, Cyrillic: 0.03). Error analysis shows OPF is strongest on structurally regular PII types (email: 0.78, phone: 0.76) and weakest on culturally variable ones (person: 0.40, address: 0.49), and is recall-biased on customer-support and medical/legal PII (P=0.31--0.54, R=0.70--0.85); global precision spans 0.31--0.86 across all domains. Comments: 11 pages, 5 tables; evaluation of a production PII detection system Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.02616 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2608.02616v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02616 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Rohith Uppala [view email] [v1] Sat, 23 May 2026 16:59:01 UTC (30 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating OpenAI's Privacy Filter: Cross-Lingual, Cross-Domain PII Detection Across 42 Benchmarks, by Rohith Uppala View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)