跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
站内改写2 分钟阅读

待翻译:Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2609.30484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do these models truly comprehend context or simply excel at pattern matching on an unprecedented scale? Contextual understanding in LLMs refers to the ability to correctly extract relevant information from a given context, integrate it into a coherent internal representation, and reason over it to produce factually consistent and contextually grounded responses. However, traditional methods such as BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) and perplexity simply measure surface-level performance. This reveals a critical gap in question answering (QA), where responses must be contextually grou…

来源arXiv AI作者: Subavarshana Arumugam, Mamta Nallaretnam, Kithuni Wickramasinghe, Chamath Gunapala, Pragatheeswaran Vipulanandan, Kamal Premaratne, Uthayasanker Thayasivam
待翻译:Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework View a PDF of the paper titled Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework, by Subavarshana Arumugam and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do these models truly comprehend context or simply excel at pattern matching on an unprecedented scale? Contextual understanding in LLMs refers to the ability to correctly extract relevant information from a given context, integrate it into a coherent internal representation, and reason over it to produce factually consistent and contextually grounded responses. However, traditional methods such as BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) and perplexity simply measure surface-level performance. This reveals a critical gap in question answering (QA), where responses must be contextually grounded rather than simply being memorized associations. To fill this void, we propose a novel knowledge graph (KG) based evaluation framework for LLM contextual understanding in QA. Central to this is Semantic Structural Similarity for KGs (S3KG), a hybrid similarity measure combining structural and semantic signals into a single score. In addition, a diagnostic analysis framework is developed to identify and categorize reasoning errors at the triplet level, enabling fine-grained analysis of model failures. Together, across nine benchmarks, S3KG achieves F1 gains of up to $+7.6$ points over the strongest baseline and AUROC up to $0.973$. Comments: Accepted in : AACL-IJCNLP 2026 Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2609.30484 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.30484v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30484 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Pragatheeswaran Vipulanandan [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:20:08 UTC (1,296 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework, by Subavarshana Arumugam and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

投资人进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2609.30484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。