本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
サイト内リライト2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2609.30484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do these models truly comprehend context or simply excel at pattern matching on an unprecedented scale? Contextual understanding in LLMs refers to the ability to correctly extract relevant information from a given context, integrate it into a coherent internal representation, and reason over it to produce factually consistent and contextually grounded responses. However, traditional methods such as BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) and perplexity simply measure surface-level performance. This reveals a critical gap in question answering (QA), where responses must be conte…

ソースarXiv AI著者: Subavarshana Arumugam, Mamta Nallaretnam, Kithuni Wickramasinghe, Chamath Gunapala, Pragatheeswaran Vipulanandan, Kamal Premaratne, Uthayasanker Thayasivam
翻訳待ち:Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework View a PDF of the paper titled Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework, by Subavarshana Arumugam and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do these models truly comprehend context or simply excel at pattern matching on an unprecedented scale? Contextual understanding in LLMs refers to the ability to correctly extract relevant information from a given context, integrate it into a coherent internal representation, and reason over it to produce factually consistent and contextually grounded responses. However, traditional methods such as BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) and perplexity simply measure surface-level performance. This reveals a critical gap in question answering (QA), where responses must be contextually grounded rather than simply being memorized associations. To fill this void, we propose a novel knowledge graph (KG) based evaluation framework for LLM contextual understanding in QA. Central to this is Semantic Structural Similarity for KGs (S3KG), a hybrid similarity measure combining structural and semantic signals into a single score. In addition, a diagnostic analysis framework is developed to identify and categorize reasoning errors at the triplet level, enabling fine-grained analysis of model failures. Together, across nine benchmarks, S3KG achieves F1 gains of up to $+7.6$ points over the strongest baseline and AUROC up to $0.973$. Comments: Accepted in : AACL-IJCNLP 2026 Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2609.30484 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.30484v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30484 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Pragatheeswaran Vipulanandan [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:20:08 UTC (1,296 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework, by Subavarshana Arumugam and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

投資家上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2609.30484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。