翻訳待ち：Cross-Platform Benchmark of Neural 3D Reconstruction for Autonomous Laboratory Robots
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要：arXiv:2608.26383v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous robots performing laboratory tasks depend on 3D reconstruction pipelines that can turn raw camera streams into actionable object representations within the latency budget of a physical control loop. Neural 3D reconstruction methods have demonstrated high-quality view synthesis, but their real-time viability across the compute platforms on which laboratory robots actually run remains poorly characterized. In this work, we present a systematic compute-platform benchmark of neural 3D reconstruction methods, evaluating NeRF and 3D Gaussian Splatting training and rendering on GPU-enabled computing devices ranging from single-board computers to server-class nodes, and place Meta's SAM3D single-image reconstruction on the same axes to quantify its latency and fidelity gap relative to per-scene optimization. Our results show that Gaussian Splatting yields higher rendering quality than NeRF at greater GPU cost, and that onboard compute is insufficient for full per-scene optimization at interactive rates. Our preliminary assessment on SAM3D indicates that it delivers plausible object geometry within seconds, but with detail mismatches that can compromise downstream manipulation. Together, these findings motivate tiered pipelines in which lightweight feed-forward reconstruction sustains the real-time perception-and-tracking loop for laboratory robots, while heavier neural reconstruction is scheduled selectively on suitable compute.
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。
--> [Submitted on 26 Aug 2026] Title:Cross-Platform Benchmark of Neural 3D Reconstruction for Autonomous Laboratory Robots View a PDF of the paper titled Cross-Platform Benchmark of Neural 3D Reconstruction for Autonomous Laboratory Robots, by Yongho Kim and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Autonomous robots performing laboratory tasks depend on 3D reconstruction pipelines that can turn raw camera streams into actionable object representations within the latency budget of a physical control loop. Neural 3D reconstruction methods have demonstrated high-quality view synthesis, but their real-time viability across the compute platforms on which laboratory robots actually run remains poorly characterized. In this work, we present a systematic compute-platform benchmark of neural 3D reconstruction methods, evaluating NeRF and 3D Gaussian Splatting training and rendering on GPU-enabled computing devices ranging from single-board computers to server-class nodes, and place Meta's SAM3D single-image reconstruction on the same axes to quantify its latency and fidelity gap relative to per-scene optimization. Our results show that Gaussian Splatting yields higher rendering quality than NeRF at greater GPU cost, and that onboard compute is insufficient for full per-scene optimization at interactive rates. Our preliminary assessment on SAM3D indicates that it delivers plausible object geometry within seconds, but with detail mismatches that can compromise downstream manipulation. Together, these findings motivate tiered pipelines in which lightweight feed-forward reconstruction sustains the real-time perception-and-tracking loop for laboratory robots, while heavier neural reconstruction is scheduled selectively on suitable compute. Comments: This manuscript is peer-reviewed from the committees in the workshop "VAxAutoSci: Visual Analytics in the Age of Autonomous Scientific Discovery" in conjunction with 2026 IEEE Visualization & Visual Analytics Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO) Cite as: arXiv:2608.26383 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2608.26383v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26383 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Yongho Kim [view email] [v1] Wed, 26 Aug 2026 20:16:02 UTC (19,059 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Cross-Platform Benchmark of Neural 3D Reconstruction for Autonomous Laboratory Robots, by Yongho Kim and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.RO new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)