跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:Complementary rPPG-Derived and Lip-Region Frequency Cues for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2609.22284v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Talking-face (TF) deepfakes are detected unevenly by rPPG-based methods across generators. We study two lightweight visual-only cues, rPPG-derived waveforms extracted by RhythmFormer and lip-region discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients, on the seven TF methods of Celeb-DF++ under a subject-independent protocol. In-domain, lip-region DCT matches or exceeds the rPPG-derived 1D ResNet on every method except SadTalker, and Concat fusion reaches AUC 0.891 against 0.824 and 0.827 for the unimodal baselines. Under leave-one-generator-out evaluation the cues split: each transfers clearly better to three held-out methods, and IP-LAP is near chance for both. Concat averages 0.798 but falls below rPPG alone where DCT…

来源arXiv Computer Vision作者: Othmane Harraq, Tamer Aldwairi
待翻译:Complementary rPPG-Derived and Lip-Region Frequency Cues for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 13 Sep 2026] Title:Complementary rPPG-Derived and Lip-Region Frequency Cues for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection View a PDF of the paper titled Complementary rPPG-Derived and Lip-Region Frequency Cues for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection, by Othmane Harraq and Tamer Aldwairi View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Talking-face (TF) deepfakes are detected unevenly by rPPG-based methods across generators. We study two lightweight visual-only cues, rPPG-derived waveforms extracted by RhythmFormer and lip-region discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients, on the seven TF methods of Celeb-DF++ under a subject-independent protocol. In-domain, lip-region DCT matches or exceeds the rPPG-derived 1D ResNet on every method except SadTalker, and Concat fusion reaches AUC 0.891 against 0.824 and 0.827 for the unimodal baselines. Under leave-one-generator-out evaluation the cues split: each transfers clearly better to three held-out methods, and IP-LAP is near chance for both. Concat averages 0.798 but falls below rPPG alone where DCT transfers poorly, so static fusion only partly exploits this complementarity. Lip-region DCT outperforms full-face DCT on six of seven methods. We treat the rPPG-derived signal as an empirical cue and do not claim it is cardiac in origin. Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.22284 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2609.22284v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22284 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Tamer Aldwairi [view email] [v1] Sun, 13 Sep 2026 03:52:54 UTC (378 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Complementary rPPG-Derived and Lip-Region Frequency Cues for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection, by Othmane Harraq and Tamer Aldwairi View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CR eess eess.IV References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

投资人进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2609.22284v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Talking-face (TF) deepfakes are detected unevenly by rPPG-based methods across generators. We study two lightweight visual-only cue…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。