跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全3 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Cloudflare Releases Clef and Clef-flash: Open-Weight Decision Models That Return Typed Probabilities Instead of Text

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:Cloudflare has released Clef (27B) and Clef-flash (9B), open-weight decision models that return typed probabilities instead of text. They are Jev-API compatible, accept images, and run on Workers AI at 209.3 ms and 38.8 ms median latency. The post Cloudflare Releases Clef and Clef-flash: Open-Weight Decision Models That Return Typed Probabilities Instead of Text appeared first on MarkTechPost.

來源MarkTechPost作者: Asif Razzaq
待翻譯:Cloudflare Releases Clef and Clef-flash: Open-Weight Decision Models That Return Typed Probabilities Instead of Text
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

Cloudflare has released Clef and Clef-flash, the first models trained by its Workers AI team. They are decision models, not chatbots. Each reads an input state and a schema of typed questions. It returns a probability for every allowed answer, with no free-form text. Both are open-weight under Apache 2.0 and compatible with TypeSafe AI’s Jev API. Is it deployable? Yes, Both models run today on Workers AI, and the weights are on Hugging Face for self-hosting. What a Decision Model Does An LLM generates tokens one at a time, and its output still needs parsing. A decision model only answers a fixed set of questions about an input. Clef supports 3 question types: noul: yes/no, returns the probability of yes. choice: picks 1 named option, with per-option probabilities and a confidence value. score: rates against an ordered rubric, returning a probability-weighted score. On Workers AI, 1 request carries up to 64 questions and up to 4 images. TypeSafe AI launched Jev, its first ‘System One’ model, on September 15, 2026. Open alternatives like Kev-9B and Laya followed. Clef uses the same System One API. Switching from Jev means changing the endpoint and model name. How Clef Works Clef is post-trained from Qwen3.8-27B, and Clef-flash from Qwen3.5-9B. Both keep the backbone’s vision encoder. Inference has 2 stages. The backbone first runs a single prefill-only pass over the state and questions. A small transformer, the joint schema head, then reads the final hidden states. It routes evidence to each question, lets fields cross-attend, and scores all options jointly. A per-question softmax turns logits into probabilities. Training froze both backbones and jointly optimized the routing head with rank-256 low-rank adapters. The loss pairs label-smoothed cross-entropy with a Brier loss for calibration. A secondary objective, Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions (RLCD), gives partial credit to adjacent ordinal choices. Interactive Explainer Benchmarks: Where Clef Wins and Where It Does Not On Cloudflare’s 10-benchmark shortlist from the Decision Index 0.2.1 suite, a Clef model scored highest on 7. BANKING77 (macro-F1): Clef 94.20 vs Jev 79.74. CLINC150+OOS (macro-F1): Clef 97.43 vs Jev 89.27. Home appliances (case exact): Clef-flash 97.73 vs Jev 52.27. Jev keeps clear leads elsewhere. The full model card shows Jev ahead on GPQA Diamond (78.3 vs 48.0). It also leads MMLU-Pro (82.7 vs 65.9) and BBH (92.9 vs 73.7). On TypeSafe’s own workflow evals, Clef beat Jev in 3 of 4 areas, by small margins. Invoice processing was 64.7 vs 61.8, customer service 76.3 vs 76.0, and security incidents 62.9 vs 61.7. Jev leads agent trace observability, 71.6 vs 68.5. In Cloudflare’s threat intelligence workflow, Clef classified a domain in 2.2 seconds. gpt-oss-120b took 4.7 seconds. All numbers are vendor-reported, with no independent replication yet. Feature Comparison FeatureClefClef-flashJevKev-9BLaya DeveloperCloudflareCloudflareTypeSafe AIJared PalmerConvai Innovations Size27B9BNot disclosed9B + 45.4M LoRA421M BackboneQwen3.8-27BQwen3.5-9BNot disclosedQwen3.5-9B-BaseModernBERT-large WeightsApache 2.0Apache 2.0Hosted APIApache 2.0Apache 2.0 Image inputYesYesNoNoNo Context65,53665,53632K (per Cloudflare)65,536 (8,192 validated)512 (English) Median latency*209.3 ms38.8 ms524.1 ms51.4 ms5.8 ms Hosted price (input)$0.24/M$0.09/M$0.042/MSelf-hostSelf-host *Cloudflare’s internal Decision Index run. All 5 implement the System One API. Sources: Clef docs, Clef-flash docs, Clef card, Jev post, Kev-9B card, Laya card. Deployment and Fine-Tuning Both models are callable through the Workers AI binding (env.AI.run()), the REST API, or AI Gateway. For self-hosting, the model cards list testing on a single H200 with BF16 weights. Cloudflare also announced a reinforcement learning service for tuning Clef on private data. It starts with Cloudflare’s forward-deployed engineers, with a self-serve platform later. The pipeline combines AI Gateway, Workers AI, Containers and a new Trainer component. Teams can apply via the design partner form. Key Takeaways Clef (27B) and Clef-flash (9B) are Apache 2.0, Jev-compatible decision models. Median latency: 209.3 ms for Clef, 38.8 ms for Clef-flash, 524.1 ms for Jev. Clef reads text, JSON, images and video within a 64K-token context window. Jev still leads on knowledge-heavy tests like GPQA Diamond, MMLU-Pro and BBH. An RL fine-tuning service starts with Cloudflare’s forward-deployed engineers. Check out the Model weight, Demo and Technical details. All credit goes to the researcher of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well. Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.? Connect with us The post Cloudflare Releases Clef and Clef-flash: Open-Weight Decision Models That Return Typed Probabilities Instead of Text appeared first on MarkTechPost.

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • Cloudflare has released Clef (27B) and Clef-flash (9B), open-weight decision models that return typed probabilities instead of text. They are Jev-API compatible, accept images, an…

技術影響

可能影響 Agent 架構、工具呼叫、工作流自動化和產品整合。

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。