跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全3 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.00047v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diversity collapse in parallel chain-of-thought has motivated inference-time interventions built on a natural design: when a process reward model (PRM) prunes a chain, its high-PRM prefix is extracted and grafted verbatim as an in-context demonstration into a still-decoding sibling. We isolate this mechanism, PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting (PPFG), as the most cost-minimal operationalization of cross-trajectory step-level transfer, and test it at the operating point where prior fragment-grafting work reports gains only under additional compensating ingredients. On Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct with Math-Shepherd on full MATH500 (n=500, three seeds), PPFG in both stagnation- and random-targeting variants is statistically indist…

來源arXiv AI作者: Khawaja Murad ul Hassan, Mehran Ebrahimi
待翻譯:Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 3 Sep 2026] Title:Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs View a PDF of the paper titled Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs, by Khawaja Murad ul Hassan and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Diversity collapse in parallel chain-of-thought has motivated inference-time interventions built on a natural design: when a process reward model (PRM) prunes a chain, its high-PRM prefix is extracted and grafted verbatim as an in-context demonstration into a still-decoding sibling. We isolate this mechanism, PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting (PPFG), as the most cost-minimal operationalization of cross-trajectory step-level transfer, and test it at the operating point where prior fragment-grafting work reports gains only under additional compensating ingredients. On Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct with Math-Shepherd on full MATH500 (n=500, three seeds), PPFG in both stagnation- and random-targeting variants is statistically indistinguishable from an independent parallel-CoT baseline on every measured axis. We characterize why: a four-bucket classification of 322 stagnation-rule injection events shows only 14% targeted a genuinely struggling chain; the rest landed on chains that had already succeeded, were near completion, or sat on a flat PRM plateau, states a rescue graft cannot change. No compound-gate refinement jointly achieves well-targeted firing and adequate density, and a random control matches the same parity at 2.4x the firing rate, so the inertness is not heuristic-specific. The finding replicates across three base LMs, six benchmarks, a second PRM, and a compatibility-gate sweep; two-one-sided-tests analysis promotes the parity to positive equivalence on all twelve Qwen/LLaMA cells. A per-event spot-check finds injected chains prune at 2.75x the matched-step rate, but a surviving-sibling counterfactual finds no population-level compensation. A hindsight oracle bounds any per-problem gain from choosing PPFG over independent at +0.13 pp. We contribute an equivalence-testing template for establishing inference-time mechanism nulls, with every claim scoped to its tested operating point. Comments: 24 pages, 4 figures, 22 tables Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2610.00047 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2610.00047v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00047 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Khawaja Murad Ul Hassan [view email] [v1] Thu, 3 Sep 2026 11:06:07 UTC (117 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs, by Khawaja Murad ul Hassan and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2610.00047v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diversity collapse in parallel chain-of-thought has motivated inference-time interventions built on a natural design: when a proces…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。