本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち3 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Calibrated Answers About Randomized Trials From a 4-Billion-Parameter Open Model: A Registered Test and a License-Clean Release

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2610.07019v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fiorillo v0.5 is an open model that answers typed questions with a probability for each answer. Its main specialist reads a randomized trial's article, cut to 6,144 tokens, and answers whether an intervention significantly increased, significantly decreased or did not significantly change an outcome against a comparator (Evidence Inference 2.0, EI). It is Qwen3-4B-Base with low-rank adapters and a decision head, fine-tuned for EI only on the 1,431 of 2,657 training articles whose own license allows reuse. Four criteria registered on the Open Science Framework before this version's test predictions decided its release, the second bar judged on EI's test split, whose labels are public. On that split (1,2…

ソースarXiv Computational Linguistics著者: Johann Emmanuel Li
翻訳待ち:Calibrated Answers About Randomized Trials From a 4-Billion-Parameter Open Model: A Registered Test and a License-Clean Release
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 4 Oct 2026] Title:Calibrated Answers About Randomized Trials From a 4-Billion-Parameter Open Model: A Registered Test and a License-Clean Release View a PDF of the paper titled Calibrated Answers About Randomized Trials From a 4-Billion-Parameter Open Model: A Registered Test and a License-Clean Release, by Johann Emmanuel Li View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Fiorillo v0.5 is an open model that answers typed questions with a probability for each answer. Its main specialist reads a randomized trial's article, cut to 6,144 tokens, and answers whether an intervention significantly increased, significantly decreased or did not significantly change an outcome against a comparator (Evidence Inference 2.0, EI). It is Qwen3-4B-Base with low-rank adapters and a decision head, fine-tuned for EI only on the 1,431 of 2,657 training articles whose own license allows reuse. Four criteria registered on the Open Science Framework before this version's test predictions decided its release, the second bar judged on EI's test split, whose labels are public. On that split (1,218 prompts in 333 articles), the expected calibration error was 0.0168 against a limit of 0.05; log loss was below the prior's by 0.8603 (95 percent interval 0.8104 to 0.9078) and below that of Gemma 4 31B-it, reading the same input, by 0.1829 (0.1164 to 0.2598); and macro-F1 was 0.9248 against 0.8668, so all four criteria passed. Training the same recipe on clean articles alone cost 0.0123 in accuracy (0.0034 to 0.0207; descriptive). With no article, macro-F1 fell to 0.4384; the title alone raised it by 0.0939 (0.0655 to 0.1234), which a title stating the result or recall of the trial could explain; exchanging intervention and comparator reversed 0.6652 of its direction answers. Run as released, the files matched the evaluated predictions within limits set in advance. The release is under the Apache License 2.0 (digital object identifier https://doi.org/10.57967/hf/10722). Comments: 20 pages, 2 figures, 13 tables. Code, results files and the paper's sources: this https URL. Model: this https URL. Registration: this https URL Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2610.07019 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.07019v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07019 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Johann Li [view email] [v1] Sun, 4 Oct 2026 15:09:39 UTC (40 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Calibrated Answers About Randomized Trials From a 4-Billion-Parameter Open Model: A Registered Test and a License-Clean Release, by Johann Emmanuel Li View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

投資家上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2610.07019v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fiorillo v0.5 is an open model that answers typed questions with a probability for each answer. Its main specialist reads a randomi…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。