AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。
[Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:Bounded Autonomy and Verifiable Safety for Agentic AI Enabled Automation View a PDF of the paper titled Bounded Autonomy and Verifiable Safety for Agentic AI Enabled Automation, by Srini Ramaswamy and 1 other authors View PDF Abstract:Agentic AI-enabled automation cannot be safely deployed in high-stakes environments on probabilistic reasoning alone. A recurring risk is epistemic drift: as reasoning deepens, system behavior may move away from subject-matter-expert constraints for safe operation. This paper presents BRaVeS, a bounded reasoning and safety-governance framework termed the Defensible Next-Gen Reasoning System (DNRS). BRaVeS encodes SME-defined constraints as invariant anchors, proposes MoDA-Style (Mixture of Depths Attention) depth-aware access as a candidate mechanism for keeping these anchors visible during inference, and uses a state hierarchy (SMARtAutonomy) to reduce autonomy as epistemic risk increases. To formalize bounded recovery, we introduce the Lyapunov-Bounded Consensus Framework (LBCF), which maps continuous epistemic-risk signals into a finite K-bag abstraction and applies shielded state transitions that enforce Lyapunov-style energy descent or route the system to a human-mediated terminal state. The formal convergence result applies to the finite LBCF abstraction under fixed thresholds and feasible-shield assumptions; it does not prove safety of the full continuous neural activation space. We evaluate the framework through a discrete event Monte Carlo simulation using HAI 22.04 industrial-control-system time-series data with synthetic noise and sensor-degradation regimes. Across the tested parameter-grouping strategies and thresholds, the LBCF process achieved finite-step convergence and no safety-guard violations. These results provide simulation-based evidence that bounded governance behavior can be enforced under the stated abstraction, while motivating future work on deployed transformer implementations, live human-in-the-loop validation, and broader adversarial settings. Comments: This paper has been accepted and will appear in the Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-026-02467-w) Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Systems and Control (eess.SY) Cite as: arXiv:2610.08815 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2610.08815v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08815 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Srini Ramaswamy [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:09:49 UTC (1,577 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Bounded Autonomy and Verifiable Safety for Agentic AI Enabled Automation, by Srini Ramaswamy and 1 other authors View PDF view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.ET cs.SY eess eess.SY References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)