跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.19180v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models face unique challenges in analyzing interdisciplinary scientific research literature. In biophysics research, faithful answers require grounding observed data in source evidence, interpreting it through a quantitative physics model, and linking it to a biological mechanism. To address this challenge, we introduce BioPhys-Bridge, a novel benchmark dataset for evidence-grounded scientific reasoning over biophysical literature. Each case contains evidence blocks, stable evidence IDs, quantitative values, units, equations, assumptions, mechanisms, and next decisions as grounding targets for question answering (QA) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The initial release contains 500 cases, 1,517 a…

來源arXiv AI作者: Qingyang Xu
待翻譯:BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 15 Sep 2026] Title:BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research View a PDF of the paper titled BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research, by Qingyang Xu View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Language models face unique challenges in analyzing interdisciplinary scientific research literature. In biophysics research, faithful answers require grounding observed data in source evidence, interpreting it through a quantitative physics model, and linking it to a biological mechanism. To address this challenge, we introduce BioPhys-Bridge, a novel benchmark dataset for evidence-grounded scientific reasoning over biophysical literature. Each case contains evidence blocks, stable evidence IDs, quantitative values, units, equations, assumptions, mechanisms, and next decisions as grounding targets for question answering (QA) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The initial release contains 500 cases, 1,517 agent-facing tasks, and covers six biological domains and nine physical model families, including three sparse families reserved for future expansion. We enforce strict quality gates for all cases in schema, evidence-integrity, quantitative-grounding, source-license, duplicate, unit-normalization, with domain expert review and annotation for 81 cases. Preliminary evaluations show that DeepSeek-V4-Flash obtain the highest evidence-ID $F_1$ score (0.360), followed by Qwen3.7-Max (0.316) and GPT-4o-mini (0.294). BioPhys-Bridge is an interdisciplinary benchmark for evaluating attribution, faithfulness, hallucination reduction, and biological experiment design with complex, multi-step scientific reasoning. Future works will increase the size and complexity of the dataset and perform comprehensive evaluations. Code and data are available in the GitHub repository and on Hugging Face. Comments: Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2026, 11 pages, 3 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM) ACM classes: K.3.1; I.2.7; I.2.11 Cite as: arXiv:2609.19180 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.19180v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19180 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Qingyang Xu [view email] [v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:53:16 UTC (1,202 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research, by Qingyang Xu View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs q-bio q-bio.QM References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2609.19180v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models face unique challenges in analyzing interdisciplinary scientific research literature. In biophysics research, faith…

技術影響

可能影響 Agent 架構、工具呼叫、工作流自動化和產品整合。

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。