跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2609.19180v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models face unique challenges in analyzing interdisciplinary scientific research literature. In biophysics research, faithful answers require grounding observed data in source evidence, interpreting it through a quantitative physics model, and linking it to a biological mechanism. To address this challenge, we introduce BioPhys-Bridge, a novel benchmark dataset for evidence-grounded scientific reasoning over biophysical literature. Each case contains evidence blocks, stable evidence IDs, quantitative values, units, equations, assumptions, mechanisms, and next decisions as grounding targets for question answering (QA) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The initial release contains 500 cases, 1,517 a…

来源arXiv AI作者: Qingyang Xu
待翻译:BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 15 Sep 2026] Title:BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research View a PDF of the paper titled BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research, by Qingyang Xu View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Language models face unique challenges in analyzing interdisciplinary scientific research literature. In biophysics research, faithful answers require grounding observed data in source evidence, interpreting it through a quantitative physics model, and linking it to a biological mechanism. To address this challenge, we introduce BioPhys-Bridge, a novel benchmark dataset for evidence-grounded scientific reasoning over biophysical literature. Each case contains evidence blocks, stable evidence IDs, quantitative values, units, equations, assumptions, mechanisms, and next decisions as grounding targets for question answering (QA) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The initial release contains 500 cases, 1,517 agent-facing tasks, and covers six biological domains and nine physical model families, including three sparse families reserved for future expansion. We enforce strict quality gates for all cases in schema, evidence-integrity, quantitative-grounding, source-license, duplicate, unit-normalization, with domain expert review and annotation for 81 cases. Preliminary evaluations show that DeepSeek-V4-Flash obtain the highest evidence-ID $F_1$ score (0.360), followed by Qwen3.7-Max (0.316) and GPT-4o-mini (0.294). BioPhys-Bridge is an interdisciplinary benchmark for evaluating attribution, faithfulness, hallucination reduction, and biological experiment design with complex, multi-step scientific reasoning. Future works will increase the size and complexity of the dataset and perform comprehensive evaluations. Code and data are available in the GitHub repository and on Hugging Face. Comments: Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2026, 11 pages, 3 figures Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM) ACM classes: K.3.1; I.2.7; I.2.11 Cite as: arXiv:2609.19180 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.19180v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19180 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Qingyang Xu [view email] [v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:53:16 UTC (1,202 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research, by Qingyang Xu View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs q-bio q-bio.QM References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

工程师进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2609.19180v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models face unique challenges in analyzing interdisciplinary scientific research literature. In biophysics research, faith…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。