本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Beyond Performance Metrics: Uncertainty Mapping of Label Ambiguity in Fazekas Score Prediction

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2609.17753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reference labels used to train medical image classification models are not always as certain as they may appear, and this uncertainty has implications on performance metrics. In this study, we propose a framework to analyze model performance for periventricular Fazekas score prediction that goes beyond conventional metrics. The Fazekas score is an ordinal visual rating scale used to assess the severity of white matter hyperintensities and is known to be affected by inter-rater variability. While the best Fazekas score prediction model achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.70, performance varied across data splits and loss functions, making interpretation of model capabilities difficult…

ソースarXiv Computer Vision著者: Susanne Schmid, Johanna Ospel, Richard Frayne, Roberto Souza
翻訳待ち:Beyond Performance Metrics: Uncertainty Mapping of Label Ambiguity in Fazekas Score Prediction
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 15 Sep 2026] Title:Beyond Performance Metrics: Uncertainty Mapping of Label Ambiguity in Fazekas Score Prediction View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Performance Metrics: Uncertainty Mapping of Label Ambiguity in Fazekas Score Prediction, by Susanne Schmid and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Reference labels used to train medical image classification models are not always as certain as they may appear, and this uncertainty has implications on performance metrics. In this study, we propose a framework to analyze model performance for periventricular Fazekas score prediction that goes beyond conventional metrics. The Fazekas score is an ordinal visual rating scale used to assess the severity of white matter hyperintensities and is known to be affected by inter-rater variability. While the best Fazekas score prediction model achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.70, performance varied across data splits and loss functions, making interpretation of model capabilities difficult. Rather than interpreting epistemic uncertainty of a model's prediction as an isolated scalar value, our approach of uncertainty mapping relates uncertainty to its position within the learned feature representation. This highlights regions of class-boundary transitions where cases appear more ambiguous and misclassifications are more likely. It also identifies potential label disagreement, including low-uncertainty misclassified cases that expert review found to be inconsistent with the original reference Fazekas score. Therefore, uncertainty mapping allows model behaviour to be examined in relation to class separation and potential model-label disagreement. Loss function choice also influenced the uncertainty profile, with some models showing clearer class separation and more localized uncertainty in ambiguous regions than others. These findings suggest that uncertainty mapping for Fazekas score predictions can support model interpretation and targeted dataset review when reference labels are affected by ambiguity/ inter-rater variability. Comments: 15 pages; 11 figures; 3 tables Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.17753 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2609.17753v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17753 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Roberto Souza [view email] [v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 19:03:55 UTC (10,786 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Performance Metrics: Uncertainty Mapping of Label Ambiguity in Fazekas Score Prediction, by Susanne Schmid and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

エンジニア上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2609.17753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reference labels used to train medical image classification models are not always as certain as they may appear, and this uncertain…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。