本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Beyond Argmax: A Mechanistic Study of Semantic Retention in Frozen Foundation-Model Composition for Generalized Few-Shot 3D Segmentation

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2609.12099v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Classical classifier-combination work distinguishes score-level fusion from hard decision-level voting. We revisit this distinction where independently pretrained, frozen foundation models are composed at inference time for generalized few-shot 3D segmentation. We ask: how much useful semantic information is lost when heterogeneous sources are collapsed to a single class before they can interact? We answer with a same-input semantic-retention intervention. Dense RegionPLC and sparse cross-view SAM3 evidence, model weights, masks, geometry, vocabularies, and fusion rules are frozen; only the number of semantic alternatives retained before interaction is varied via a matched top-k ladder. On 156 held-out…

ソースarXiv Computer Vision著者: Silas Kwabla Gah, Ebenezer Owusu
翻訳待ち:Beyond Argmax: A Mechanistic Study of Semantic Retention in Frozen Foundation-Model Composition for Generalized Few-Shot 3D Segmentation
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 10 Sep 2026] Title:Beyond Argmax: A Mechanistic Study of Semantic Retention in Frozen Foundation-Model Composition for Generalized Few-Shot 3D Segmentation View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Argmax: A Mechanistic Study of Semantic Retention in Frozen Foundation-Model Composition for Generalized Few-Shot 3D Segmentation, by Silas Kwabla Gah and Ebenezer Owusu View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Classical classifier-combination work distinguishes score-level fusion from hard decision-level voting. We revisit this distinction where independently pretrained, frozen foundation models are composed at inference time for generalized few-shot 3D segmentation. We ask: how much useful semantic information is lost when heterogeneous sources are collapsed to a single class before they can interact? We answer with a same-input semantic-retention intervention. Dense RegionPLC and sparse cross-view SAM3 evidence, model weights, masks, geometry, vocabularies, and fusion rules are frozen; only the number of semantic alternatives retained before interaction is varied via a matched top-k ladder. On 156 held-out ScanNet200 scenes, top-1 reaches 28.47 harmonic-mean (HM) IoU while full distribution fusion reaches 34.87 HM (+6.40, 95% CI [+5.24,+7.64]). The pattern replicates on 50 ScanNet++ scenes: 23.02 vs. 26.50 HM (+3.48, 95% CI [+1.64,+5.93]). The conclusion is robust: full-distribution HM is stable across sparse-source weights 0.3--0.7; alternative operators (max, geometric pooling) also outperform top-1; and a GroundingDINO--SAM2.1 source-replacement diagnostic shows monotonic HM increase from 14.77 to 18.75 with full retention. Calibration diagnostics reveal opposite miscalibration of the two sources, yet correcting calibration does not eliminate the retention advantage. Across datasets and source stacks, most information is recovered by retaining a compact set of plausible alternatives. The contribution is a controlled diagnosis of premature semantic collapse as a repeatable information bottleneck in heterogeneous frozen-model composition. Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.12099 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2609.12099v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12099 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Silas Gah Mr [view email] [v1] Thu, 10 Sep 2026 18:25:53 UTC (8,032 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Argmax: A Mechanistic Study of Semantic Retention in Frozen Foundation-Model Composition for Generalized Few-Shot 3D Segmentation, by Silas Kwabla Gah and Ebenezer Owusu View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

エンジニア上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2609.12099v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Classical classifier-combination work distinguishes score-level fusion from hard decision-level voting. We revisit this distinction…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。