跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
站內改寫2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.13240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The AffectiveArt Multidimensional Art Emotion Understanding task asks to jointly predict an artwork's fine-grained emotion (12 classes, 1549:1 head-to-tail ratio), binary valence/arousal, and five attribute-grounded descriptions -- sub-tasks that exhibit strong empirical trade-offs, so the single-model solutions we tried do not jointly optimize all of them well. We present ArtSociety, a multi-agent framework that assembles heterogeneous multimodal experts -- a DINOv2-Giant vision agent (A1), a scene-grounded CoT fine-tuned MLLM (A2), and three closed-source reasoning agents (A3-A5) -- and coordinates them with two training-free controllers: (i) a rare-class-aware voting arbiter that lowers the agreement threshold…

來源arXiv Computer Vision作者: Jian Li, Fanfan Ji, Jinxiang Lai, Ying Tai, Jian Yang, Xiao-Tong Yuan, Chengjie Wang, Yabiao Wang
待翻譯:ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 3 Sep 2026] Title:ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding View a PDF of the paper titled ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding, by Jian Li and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The AffectiveArt Multidimensional Art Emotion Understanding task asks to jointly predict an artwork's fine-grained emotion (12 classes, 1549:1 head-to-tail ratio), binary valence/arousal, and five attribute-grounded descriptions -- sub-tasks that exhibit strong empirical trade-offs, so the single-model solutions we tried do not jointly optimize all of them well. We present ArtSociety, a multi-agent framework that assembles heterogeneous multimodal experts -- a DINOv2-Giant vision agent (A1), a scene-grounded CoT fine-tuned MLLM (A2), and three closed-source reasoning agents (A3-A5) -- and coordinates them with two training-free controllers: (i) a rare-class-aware voting arbiter that lowers the agreement threshold for tail emotions, exploiting decorrelated error patterns across agent families; and (ii) a description-first reasoning agent whose DESCRIBE-then-CLASSIFY chain of thought forces visual evidence before label commitment, yielding near-perfect grounded descriptions. A task-routing policy directs the hard emotion task to the full five-agent ensemble while assigning the near-saturated valence/arousal and generative description tasks to the single strongest reasoning agent. On the official test set (1,000 artworks), ArtSociety achieves an Overall Score of 0.8870 (Classification 0.7789, Description 0.9952). An eleven-variant ablation study reveals that, once method and scale saturate at around 0.76, the decisive gains come from agent collaboration and data-side supervision -- a 30B MoE model trained on older data does not outperform an 8B model trained on better data. Code is available at this https URL Comments: Accepted at the ACM Multimedia 2026 Grand Challenge (AffectiveArt). 8 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables. Code: this https URL Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) ACM classes: I.2.10; I.2.7; I.4.8; H.5.1 Cite as: arXiv:2609.13240 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2609.13240v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13240 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3767308.3837723 DOI(s) linking to related resources Submission history From: Jian Li [view email] [v1] Thu, 3 Sep 2026 11:25:15 UTC (7,332 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding, by Jian Li and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2609.13240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The AffectiveArt Multidimensional Art Emotion Understanding task asks to jointly predict an artwork's fine-grained emotion (12 clas…

技術影響

可能影響 Agent 架構、工具呼叫、工作流自動化和產品整合。

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。