本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Alpha: Systematic Fault Injection and Robustness Evaluation for LLM-Driven Embodied Manipulation

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2610.30197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into embodied robotic planning, yet standard benchmarks primarily evaluate end-to-end task completion in nominal environments, obscuring failure origins across the execution stack. We present Alpha, a systematic fault-injection and robustness-evaluation framework for LLM-driven manipulation in simulation. Alpha injects calibrated faults across perception (sensor lag), actuation (grip slip), kinematics (unreachable targets), and planning (planner-output corruption), alongside concurrent conditions. To separate physical vulnerabilities from planner sensitivities, we introduce a matched methodology pairing an LLM agent (Llama-3 via Ollama) against a…

ソースarXiv Robotics著者: Jona Joy
翻訳待ち:Alpha: Systematic Fault Injection and Robustness Evaluation for LLM-Driven Embodied Manipulation
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 21 Oct 2026] Title:Alpha: Systematic Fault Injection and Robustness Evaluation for LLM-Driven Embodied Manipulation View a PDF of the paper titled Alpha: Systematic Fault Injection and Robustness Evaluation for LLM-Driven Embodied Manipulation, by Jona Joy View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into embodied robotic planning, yet standard benchmarks primarily evaluate end-to-end task completion in nominal environments, obscuring failure origins across the execution stack. We present Alpha, a systematic fault-injection and robustness-evaluation framework for LLM-driven manipulation in simulation. Alpha injects calibrated faults across perception (sensor lag), actuation (grip slip), kinematics (unreachable targets), and planning (planner-output corruption), alongside concurrent conditions. To separate physical vulnerabilities from planner sensitivities, we introduce a matched methodology pairing an LLM agent (Llama-3 via Ollama) against a deterministic Scripted Oracle planner across a balanced 150-episode matrix under identical seeds, geometries, and safety criteria. Across the matrix, the Oracle achieves 64.0% (48/75) success while the LLM achieves 44.0% (33/75) (paired McNemar p = 3.01 x 10^-4). Crucially, excluding planner-output corruption, performance across all physical and kinematic conditions is identical: 55.0% (33/60) for both planners with zero discordant pairs (McNemar p = 1.00). This demonstrates that physical actuator slip, kinematic reach boundaries, and perceptual staleness affect deterministic controllers and LLM planners equivalently. The performance gap is driven entirely by planner-output corruption (100% Oracle vs. 0% LLM), isolating the prompt-to-JSON serialization and validation interface rather than a cognitive reasoning deficit. We also audit 169 historical pilot attempts for transparency. Comments: 9 pages, 7 figures, 6 tables. Code and reproduction artifacts: this https URL Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO) Cite as: arXiv:2610.30197 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2610.30197v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30197 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Jona Joy [view email] [v1] Wed, 21 Oct 2026 07:06:59 UTC (2,120 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Alpha: Systematic Fault Injection and Robustness Evaluation for LLM-Driven Embodied Manipulation, by Jona Joy View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.RO new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

投資家上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2610.30197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into embodied robotic planning, yet standard benchmarks primarily evaluate…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。