待翻译：A Multi-Domain Red Teaming Framework for Safety, Robustness, and Fairness Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models
AI 服务暂时不可用，以下为来源摘要，待恢复后补全翻译：arXiv:2606.00027v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across healthcare, yet existing benchmarks fail to capture model behavior under adversarial or ethically complex conditions common in clinical practice. We developed a multi-domain red teaming framework evaluating eleven contemporary LLMs across 690 clinically grounded scenarios spanning nine domains and over 150 subcategories. Scenarios incorporated adversarial transformations, and responses were assessed using a seven-dimension rubric with LLM-assisted scoring and human-in-the-loop validation. Results revealed substantial performance variance, with mean scores ranging from 0.791 to 0.984. Critically, several high-performing systems produced complete failures in individual safety-critical scenarios, demonstrating that aggregate accuracy masks clinically meaningful risk. The highest-performing systems (X-BAI, GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.1) achieved scores above 0.97 with low variance, while performance varied significantly across domains. Equity-related tasks showed 10-20% error amplification with demographic modifications, and human reviewers identified clinically relevant failures missed by automated evaluation. Our findings demonstrate that performance variance and worst-case failures provide more clinically meaningful reliability indicators than mean accuracy alone, and that hybrid evaluation approaches combining automation with clinician oversight are essential for credible safety assessment.
AI 服务暂时不可用，以下为来源正文，待恢复后补全翻译。
[2606.00027] A Multi-Domain Red Teaming Framework for Safety, Robustness, and Fairness Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models [Submitted on 15 Apr 2026] Title:A Multi-Domain Red Teaming Framework for Safety, Robustness, and Fairness Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models View a PDF of the paper titled A Multi-Domain Red Teaming Framework for Safety, Robustness, and Fairness Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models, by Andrei Marian Feier and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across healthcare, yet existing benchmarks fail to capture model behavior under adversarial or ethically complex conditions common in clinical practice. We developed a multi-domain red teaming framework evaluating eleven contemporary LLMs across 690 clinically grounded scenarios spanning nine domains and over 150 subcategories. Scenarios incorporated adversarial transformations, and responses were assessed using a seven-dimension rubric with LLM-assisted scoring and human-in-the-loop validation. Results revealed substantial performance variance, with mean scores ranging from 0.791 to 0.984. Critically, several high-performing systems produced complete failures in individual safety-critical scenarios, demonstrating that aggregate accuracy masks clinically meaningful risk. The highest-performing systems (X-BAI, GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.1) achieved scores above 0.97 with low variance, while performance varied significantly across domains. Equity-related tasks showed 10-20% error amplification with demographic modifications, and human reviewers identified clinically relevant failures missed by automated evaluation. Our findings demonstrate that performance variance and worst-case failures provide more clinically meaningful reliability indicators than mean accuracy alone, and that hybrid evaluation approaches combining automation with clinician oversight are essential for credible safety assessment. Comments: 10 pages, 4 figures. To be presented at the Text2Story 2026 Workshop (Delft, The Netherlands, 29 March 2026); CEUR Workshop Proceedings (forthcoming). Affiliation: John Snow Labs Inc Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.00027 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2606.00027v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.00027 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Yigit Gul [view email] [v1] Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:57:55 UTC (3,394 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled A Multi-Domain Red Teaming Framework for Safety, Robustness, and Fairness Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models, by Andrei Marian Feier and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)